Guilherme C. Hazan writes:
> > Just read carefully their page:
> > http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
> Sure, but why the OSI logo at the main page???
It isn't not anymore.
--
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | You know you have a
Crynwr sells suppor
Rod Dixon scripsit:
> I think Larry will have to answer your question authoritatively. In my
> opinion, the distinctions assumed by your question are impertinent. OSI
> has the legal authority to control the use of its certification trade mark
> within the parameters it sets forth. If they say und
I think Larry will have to answer your question authoritatively. In my
opinion, the distinctions assumed by your question are impertinent. OSI
has the legal authority to control the use of its certification trade mark
within the parameters it sets forth. If they say under condition X, vendor
Y is n
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Eugene Wee wrote:
> Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > Where does it say that "OSI certified" mark cannot be used with a BSD
> > license text titled "Foo Open License v1.2"?
>
> I suppose that might be:
> "Use of these marks for software that is not distributed under an OSI approved
> li
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Where does it say that "OSI certified" mark cannot be used with a BSD
license text titled "Foo Open License v1.2"?
I suppose that might be:
"Use of these marks for software that is not distributed under an OSI approved
license is an infringement of OSI's certification marks
>used with their permission. The permission required is described
um, i think this could be misunderstood. you don't need thier
*permission* you need to meet the guidelines that they require. this
does not require written permission per se (at least that I can find) as
long as you are distributing
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> If those licenses are not approved by OSI, they may not use our
> certification mark. We don't care what they "look like."
Does OSI approve the text of the license, the title of the license, or
a combination of the text and the title?
Where does it say
ED]
> www.rosenlaw.com
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:42 PM
> > To: Guilherme C. Hazan
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Why "open-source" m
"Guilherme C. Hazan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What we need to do to place the logo at our site? Just get it and put in the
> html?
The logo is trademarked by the Open Source Initiative. It may only be
used with their permission. The permission required is described
here:
http://opensou
.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:42 PM
> To: Guilherme C. Hazan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why "open-source" means "free to distribute"?
>
>
> On Thu, 6 M
Guilherme C. Hazan scripsit:
> But GlueCode's license is OSI-certified and their license is clearly
> distribution-limited:
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
Simple. Their license is *not* OSI certified and they are misusing the logo
under false pretenses. (Their proprie
Guilherme C. Hazan wrote:
Hi,
Just read carefully their page:
http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
ESL: Enterprise Source License
OSL: OEM Source License
None is an OSI approved license. In particular, the Enterprise Source
License is certainly not open-source since it does not
Hi Alex
> > Can i also create a license that is not OSI and place the logo at
> > the main page? That could make my users happy. ;-D
>
> Only if you also distribute some software, to some users, under OSI
> license, I guess.
That makes sense. But what we think when we see the logo in the site is
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Guilherme C. Hazan wrote:
> Can i also create a license that is not OSI and place the logo at
> the main page? That could make my users happy. ;-D
Only if you also distribute some software, to some users, under OSI
license, I guess. I do not see a direct answer to your questio
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Fabian Bastin wrote:
> Just read carefully their page:
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
>
> ESL: Enterprise Source License
>
> OSL: OEM Source License
>
> None is an OSI approved license.
We do not know what OEM Source License is. It could be a BSD lic
Just read carefully their page:
http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
ESL: Enterprise Source License
OSL: OEM Source License
None is an OSI approved license. In particular, the Enterprise Source
License is certainly not open-source since it does not allow to
distribute modified ve
Hi,
> Just read carefully their page:
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
>
> ESL: Enterprise Source License
>
> OSL: OEM Source License
>
> None is an OSI approved license. In particular, the Enterprise Source
> License is certainly not open-source since it does not allow to
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Guilherme C. Hazan wrote:
> > The paragraphs you seem to be referring to are not licenses. They only
> > refer to OSL and ESL licenses.
>
> What does OSL and ESL stands for?
Enterprise Source License and OEM Source License.
I am guessing these are Gluecode-invented names. I
Hi,
> The paragraphs you seem to be referring to are not licenses. They only
> refer to OSL and ESL licenses.
What does OSL and ESL stands for?
thx
guich
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Guilherme C. Hazan wrote:
> > I do not see a license on their web site. What GlueCode's license is
> > OSI-certified?
>
> Do you recognise the green icon at left?
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/index.html
>
> See the orange menu? Click the last link: "open source licens
> I do not see a license on their web site. What GlueCode's license is
> OSI-certified?
Do you recognise the green icon at left?
http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/index.html
See the orange menu? Click the last link: "open source licensing"
Read it. Isnt it distribution-limited?
regards
I do not see a license on their web site. What GlueCode's license is
OSI-certified?
Alex.
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Guilherme C. Hazan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since my last thread was little deturped from the main question, i'm
> starting another one.
> So, people stated that "open-source" is "free to distr
Hi,
Since my last thread was little deturped from the main question, i'm
starting another one.
So, people stated that "open-source" is "free to distribute".
But GlueCode's license is OSI-certified and their license is clearly
distribution-limited:
http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensi
23 matches
Mail list logo
