[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newcomer.Could tell me what the DMCA is?
good grief. your search engine must have flooded
its carbeurator. cause mine came up with a bazillion
hits with just 'dmca'. (yes, exactly 1 bazillion hits,
no more, no less.) ;)
but to give you a jump start, I think the
On Monday 10 September 2001 10:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for seeing what I was trying to say. When I heards of this open
source movement I was intrigued to see how they could do what they do
without intellectual property protection, a institution that they attack so
much.
I don't pretend to fully understand your 'movement'. I konw the principle
behind copytleft: it is a means to an end. But as I understand it, within
your belief that everyone is free to copy software, there are restrictions on
further use and a flat fee is payable. Am I misguided. You do not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can I ensure that I get e-mailed further discussions on this list?
JEETUN6,
You can subscribe to this list by sending an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are archives of this list somewhere (a link has been published on
the list -- I know -- that doesn't help
It's common practice to quote part of the e-mail to which you are
replying, as I am doing here, in order to maintain some context in the
conversation.
It is also polite to set your mailer to not send HTML mail to a
mailing list such as this one.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many thanks for
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:54:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that there has been some discussion and assertion about the powers
bestowed by copyright. The focus has been on what it apparently allows the
owner to prevent 'legitimate' users to do. I do not know which jurisdiction
:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: copyright discussion
I see that there has been some discussion and assertion about the powers
bestowed by copyright. The focus has been on what it apparently
allows the
owner to prevent 'legitimate' users to do. I do not know which
jurisdiction
allows
On Monday 10 September 2001 07:13 pm, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:
Who on this list beside myself wondered whether Praveen posted his message
on this list without consideration of why most of us support open source?
Or, did I miss something?
Yes, you did miss something.
That particular set
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: copyright discussion
On Monday 10 September 2001 07:13 pm, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:
Who on this list beside myself wondered whether Praveen posted
his message
on this list without consideration of why most of us support
open source?
Or, did I miss something?
Yes
I don't pretend to fully understand your 'movement'. I konw the principle
behind copytleft: it is a means to an end. But as I understand it, within
your belief that everyone is free to copy software, there are restrictions on
further use and a flat fee is payable. Am I misguided. You do not
Many thanks for seeing what I was trying to say. When I heards of this open
source movement I was intrigued to see how they could do what they do without
intellectual property protection, a institution that they attack so much. How
much of a surprise then was it to discover that they actually
12 matches
Mail list logo
