On Tuesday 27 November 2001 16:31, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:30:46AM -0400, Steve Mallett wrote:
> > Excuse my insolence, but I _personnally_ don't find this that far
> > off-topic (see 'licensing issues" above). Compared to what can be/is
> > discussed at length anyway.
>
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:30:46AM -0400, Steve Mallett wrote:
> Excuse my insolence, but I _personnally_ don't find this that far off-topic
> (see 'licensing issues" above). Compared to what can be/is discussed at
> length anyway.
Yeah, I guess I'm one of those that would rather see list tra
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 16:17, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:40:28PM -0600, Tom Hull wrote:
> > I would like to collect some information about copyright and
> > licensing issues for databases. The intent is to build large
>
> I'd suggest that this is probably off-topic for
> I would like to collect some information about copyright and
> licensing issues for databases. The intent is to build large
> stores of data, such as music discography. Such databases
> would not necessarily be centralized, but should be inter-
> operable. For example, someone could extract the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:40:28PM -0600, Tom Hull wrote:
> I would like to collect some information about copyright and
> licensing issues for databases. The intent is to build large
I'd suggest that this is probably off-topic for this list, whose purpose
is to discuss licenses for acceptance as
I would like to collect some information about copyright and
licensing issues for databases. The intent is to build large
stores of data, such as music discography. Such databases
would not necessarily be centralized, but should be inter-
operable. For example, someone could extract the relevant
d
6 matches
Mail list logo
