For the concrete example of Microsoft using parts of Linux, they would
legally have to release the source of Windows under the GPL. This
will *never* happen while pigs remain land bound animals, but if it
did, I'm sure that the Free Software Foundation (and anyone who
believes in the philosophy w
DeBug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My question is what are the restrictions in lesser GPL ?
> In other words what is the difference between
> a) I write software and give it away for free without copyrighting it
> b) I write software copyright it and issue it under lesser GPL
The restrictions i
2 matches
Mail list logo
