Re: [Licq-devel] Fw: Bug in LICQ 1.2.0

2002-10-14 Thread Michael
Hi Dear All, So well, pressing on "Yes" in "You didnt edit this message, are you sure you want to send it?" warning is imho annoying... On Monday 14 October 2002 19:12, Jonas Jensen wrote: > Forwarding to licq-devel. It's still broken in CVS as of 2002-10-13. > > -Forwarded Message- > >

Re: [Licq-devel] Fw: Bug in LICQ 1.2.0

2002-10-14 Thread Michael
Hi Dear All, So well, pressing on "Yes" in "You didnt edit this message, are you sure you want to send it?" warning is imho annoying... On Monday 14 October 2002 19:12, Jonas Jensen wrote: > Forwarding to licq-devel. It's still broken in CVS as of 2002-10-13. > > -Forwarded Message- > >

[Licq-devel] Fw: Bug in LICQ 1.2.0

2002-10-14 Thread Jonas Jensen
Forwarding to licq-devel. It's still broken in CVS as of 2002-10-13. -Forwarded Message- From: Mathias Bondeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Licq-main] Bug in LICQ 1.2.0 Date: 14 Oct 2002 16:02:49 +0200 When sending a message larger than 450 (if I remember correct

[Licq-devel] ICQ 2002a and LICQ

2002-10-14 Thread Arne Schmitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am using an LICQ snapshot from the 9 Oct 2002 with enabled TCPv8 support. Now sometimes when I send a direct message to some Windows ICQ 2002a user, they change to occupied mode, although they never did that by themselves. This does not happen th