libicq2000
these two capabilities have the numbers 3 (ICQ) and 8 (ICQServerRelay)
if that means something to anyone. I don't even know if those numbers
have any meaning outside libicq2000.
So it it licq or libicq2000 that's broken here?
--
Jonas Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
libicq2000
these two capabilities have the numbers 3 (ICQ) and 8 (ICQServerRelay)
if that means something to anyone. I don't even know if those numbers
have any meaning outside libicq2000.
So it it licq or libicq2000 that's broken here?
--
Jonas Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
] Shaking hands with Lagoni (60150340) [v7].
09:01:33: [TCP] Connection to 60150340 was closed.
09:01:33: [WRN] Socket 32 does not exist (#-1).
Also, this one seemed to appear out of nowhere:
09:03:03: [WRN] Internal Error: CIniFile::WriteStr(DefaultEncoding, NULL).
/Jonas Jensen
hough, but it looks
like it should be easy.
So will we get the gui counterpart of this feature soon? :-)
/Jonas Jensen
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 08:43, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Monday 14 October 2002 06:28 pm, Michael wrote:
> > So well, pressing on "Yes" in "You didnt edit this message, are you sure
> > you want to send it?" warning is imho annoying...
>
> In what context do you receive this message? This thread is a
Forwarding to licq-devel. It's still broken in CVS as of 2002-10-13.
-Forwarded Message-
From: Mathias Bondeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Licq-main] Bug in LICQ 1.2.0
Date: 14 Oct 2002 16:02:49 +0200
When sending a message larger than 450 (if I remember correct
same advantages as when you talk in chatmode
while online.
OTOH, if each message just needs to be read once and then discarded, the
old system wins, but IMO the difference isn't big enough to justify
keeping the old behavior. You ca
close a window in qt-gui?
/Jonas Jensen
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pe of window or
> raises it if it's already created
> * in chatmode messageview messages are cleared by activating
> the window
>
> I hope it works.
I wanted to try it, but your mail client has broken long lines, screwed
up indentations etc. so it's not in vali
Christian B. Wiik wrote:
>Running qt-3.0.3 on a RedHat 7.3 box
>
>
I think they broke it on purpose to make you upgrade to qt-3.0.5. When I
upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.0.5 I noticed a few other bugs disappearing, so
it's worth it.
and you.
>
>
The way I understand it is that the phone/cellular icons that show up
next to users on the contact list are strange. It's very hard to guess
that they're supposed to look like phones.
/Jonas Jensen
---
This sf.n
solved this by making licq fall back to v6 instead of v2 when it
receives an invalid protocol version. Patch attached.
/Jonas Jensen
--- licq-old/src/icqd.cpp Wed Jul 17 05:34:29 2002
+++ licq/src/icqd.cpp Wed Jul 17 17:44:31 2002
@@ -743,8 +743,8 @@
unsigned short v_out = v_in &l
diff format I'll add it. BTW, aren't
you forgetting to call gUserManager.DropOwner()?
Any other important patches I forgot?
/Jonas Jensen
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
h
hey'd rather stay in their own world, playing
with the server side contact list code and ignore other contributions.
/Jonas Jensen
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
ho understands all this, I guess nobody will object and it'll be your
decision if the change should be implemented.
/Jonas Jensen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
Augu
Norberto Bensa wrote:
>That's what we call "English a la Argentina" ;-)
>
>He meant "before your patch, it worked" or something like that.
>
>
Ok. But I still don't understand what the problem was.
/Jonas Jensen
__
Matias Aguirre wrote:
>well... before not it towards
>
>
Sorry... I give up trying to understand what you mean.
/Jonas Jensen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 i
hing to do with my patch?
/Jonas Jensen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_
>compiling with debugging symbols, do something like this:
>
Thanks, my problem was that the max core file size was set to 0. I've
set it to 200MB now ("limit core 200M" in zsh).
And I checked that --enable-debug made it compile with
+0x3a) [0x4029146a]
Attempting to generate core file.
Is this helpful in any way? Otherwise I'd like to know how to get core
files from licq.
/Jonas Jensen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
7;s package) on one machine and
qt-x11-free-3.0.4 (compiled from tarball) on another. I've tested it on
both.
/Jonas Jensen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las
Also, to save space I've removed "Message". This is because 99% of all
events are usually messages, so it's not really necessary to print this.
For other event types they are still printed like always:
Chat Request 14:34:02 [D---] Bones0:
hey...
licq-names-in-chat.patch
lose button, but I got into the habit of just using the X pretty quickly.
So my licq no longer crashes for this reason, but I still have
occational crashes when my status is checked or someone sends me a
message over a direct connection.
/Jonas Jensen
d tomorrow morning (200MHz :-)).
From what I can see it usually crashes when receiving messages, and
messages from other licqs seem more likely to crash it than messages
from Windows icqs. I just checked my history files and found that I
receive about 100 messages every day, which would explai
licq CVS has been very unstable since about February 2002. I usually get
a segfault every 1 or 2 days, and my friends have the same experience.
Is it stable for everyone else, or is it just something you don't talk
about? I know that a CVS release is expected to be buggy, but I consider
this t
25 matches
Mail list logo
