Hello,
In another step to streamline development and speed things up, I have
set up Trac for use with Licq. It will eventually replace the Wiki as
well. All bug management has been moved from SourceForge to Trac, so
please use that.
The new url is http://trac.licq.org
You will also see a milesto
Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
> Submit suggestions for the web site, FAQ etc.
>
The gnome-gui is mentioned in the plugin section to be version 0.50.1, while the
aktiual is euh.. lemme see... ver 0.51
Thanks. :)
Arjen
___
Licq-devel mailing lis
Hi,
Henrik Karlsson wrote:
> > But I'm rather shure the developers will happily accept nice patches
> > for those little bugs, so Anton is invited to submit some :-)
>
> I'm sure that I'm not the only one that can't code but wants to
> contribute to the development of Licq. What can I do? How d
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Markus Schaber wrote:
> But I'm rather shure the developers will happily accept nice patches for
> those little bugs, so Anton is invited to submit some :-)
I'm sure that I'm not the only one that can't code but wants to contribute
to the development of Licq. What can I do? H
Hi,
Kingsly John wrote:
> |What is your policy regarding bug fixing, i wonder? For example do
> |you want to fix all bugs with a certain priority before the next
> |release? Is there a main developer that has one big job, fixing all
> |those irritating little bugs?
>
> Right now the top pri
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Anton Jansen wrote:
|bugtracker, instead of making them invalid you simply ignore them. For
|example bug #460164, I reported it 5 months from now and the problem is
|still there.
If it's a bug with the 1.0.x series it is no longer being maintained and
will most probably ne
Hi all developers of licq,
First of all i would like to say you have created one of the best icq
clients around. There is however one thing that irritates me, you don't
seem to maintain the bug list. There are a lot of open bugs in the sf
bugtracker, instead of making them invalid you simply igno
