On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:54:51PM +0100, Philipp Kolmann wrote:
> I have applied the patch, but still can't receive a connection from a 1.3.0
> client:
Try the CVS daily. It's being built now... 20051203
Jon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:01:18AM +0900, Jon Keating wrote:
> After examining the code, it looks like the problem was introduced around
> May 20th. The current CVS has the proper fix in there in reality it was
> just a one line fix.
I have applied the patch, but still can't receive a connect
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 04:55:30PM +0100, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> m_nSize += strlen(m_szMessage); is replaced by
> m_nMsgLen = strlen(m_szMessage) + 1; etc.
> why not the line above ?
> It is only my first look, don't bother to explain why, if it is O.K.
> Just say it is O.K.
Both are fine, I
2005/12/2, Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's on Licq-CVS...
Thank you.
> --- icqpacket.cpp 7 Oct 2005 16:34:01 - 1.124
> +++ icqpacket.cpp 2 Dec 2005 15:00:02 - 1.125
> @@ -4827,7 +4827,8 @@
> m_nSize -= strlen(m_szMessage);
^^^
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 04:20:27PM +0100, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> Can you post this patch, please, if it is only one line. I don't want
> to download a whole CVS version and look for it. Maybe I'm not the
> only one.
It's on Licq-CVS...
Jon
Index: icqpacket.cpp
Can you post this patch, please, if it is only one line. I don't want
to download a whole CVS version and look for it. Maybe I'm not the
only one.
Thank you.
Regards Ladislav.
2005/12/2, Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After examining the code, it looks like the problem was introduced aroun
After examining the code, it looks like the problem was introduced around May
20th.
The current CVS has the proper fix in there in reality it was just a one
line fix.
Enjoy your SSL again...
Jon
pgpEwww7Ftc7s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
