Simon Perreault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ICQ in Windows uses the double-click behavior, and therefore it is the
> default option. Advanced licq users who like to open new messages with the
> middle mouse button can uncheck the new option.
Actually, what kind of an argument is that?
I like
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 13:10:35 -0500 (EST)
"Stewart Honsberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > GnomeICU has support for server side contact lists.
>
> Is this feature optional, or forced?
AFAIK, it's forced in the latest version. Perhaps, this is part of the new protocol
version?
Jamin W. Coll
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Ian Collier wrote:
|On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:06:20PM +0530, Kingsly John wrote:
|> http://web.icq.com/icqlite/
|
|It doesn't support peer-to-peer message mode or any of the other functions
|that require a peer-to-peer connection.
IMO their other offering was worse ...
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:06:20PM +0530, Kingsly John wrote:
> I was talking about the windows clients... they have a java applet that
> uses the new protocol and works pretty good(better than the old one
> anyways)
> http://web.icq.com/icqlite/
It doesn't support peer-to-peer message mode or
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Ian Collier wrote:
|On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:04:46PM +0530, Kingsly John wrote:
|> They have released a statement that all older clients have a buffer
|> overflow vulnerability ... so everyone is adviced to upgrade to the latest
|> ICQ release which is the only one th
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:04:46PM +0530, Kingsly John wrote:
> They have released a statement that all older clients have a buffer
> overflow vulnerability ... so everyone is adviced to upgrade to the latest
> ICQ release which is the only one that is safe!
0.981a *is* the latest ICQ release f
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Ian Collier wrote:
|PS Has anyone tried getting AOL to admit that the v5 protocol
|doesn't work properly any more? I'm currently trying to do that...
They have released a statement that all older clients have a buffer
overflow vulnerability ... so everyone is adviced to
Hi, Ian!
Ian Collier, hereinafter "IC", writes:
>> And lost 90% of messages sent trough the server...
IC> I don't send messages through server (guess why). :-)
Some my collocutors are behind the monstr-firewalls ;)
Regrettably direct sent to him is impossible
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|as you advised, dowloaded openssl from rpm.net but hitting conflict
|error, when i tried to install openssl
|
|tried again to install licq, :( still the same problem
you don't need to do that .
you'll find a file called libssl.so.1 or
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:18:00PM +0600, Oleg Tkachik wrote:
> And lost 90% of messages sent trough the server...
I don't send messages through server (guess why). :-)
imc
___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge
Hi, Ian!
Ian Collier, hereinafter "IC", writes:
>> This stable version using v5 protocol unsupported by AOL.
IC> It's not totally unsupported - there are a limited number of things
IC> you can still do with it (and that's fine for me - I'm still happily
IC> using Licq 1.0 )
PS Has anyone tried getting AOL to admit that the v5 protocol
doesn't work properly any more? I'm currently trying to do that...
imc
___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:04:21PM +0600, Oleg Tkachik wrote:
> IC> [*] Isn't 1.0.4 the current version?
> This stable version using v5 protocol unsupported by AOL.
It's not totally unsupported - there are a limited number of things
you can still do with it (and that's fine for me - I
Hi, Ian!
Ian Collier, hereinafter "IC", writes:
IC> compiled on Red Hat 7.2. If it's possible for you to upgrade to 7.2
IC> then that would probably solve things.
Nice advice.
If u want to use licq, upgrade a linux box ;)
IC> The best thing to do in this
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:09:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as you advised, dowloaded openssl from rpm.net but hitting conflict
> error, when i tried to install openssl
You probably have openssl installed already, but in a version that's not
compatible with the licq binary rpm. The bina
as you advised, dowloaded openssl from rpm.net but hitting conflict error, when i
tried to install openssl
tried again to install licq, :( still the same problem
need more explaination :(( do i need to compile? the website doesnt explains how to
install :(, the faq is not so helpful for
16 matches
Mail list logo
