On Wednesday 05 June 2002 10:35 pm, Daniel Klein wrote:
> I am using SuSE 7.2 Linux, Licq 1.0.3
That's your problem... upgrade at least to LICQ 1.0.4 or try CVS.
HTH,
Norberto
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer'
Hello all,
after reading through the bugtracker on the sourceforge site I am really none
the wiser.. so I decided to hope for my luck in this place. Here goes my
description:
I am using SuSE 7.2 Linux, Licq 1.0.3 and when trying to send a message it
never comes through. Unless described in th
Phillip Pi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The CVS I downloaded a few days ago is really stable on my two Linux
> machines (Red Hat v7.1 and v7.2). At least it should be released as 1.05
> Beta or something.
I use it on Red Hat 7.2, and have a crash or two once in a while. I
guess that's (also) wh
The CVS I downloaded a few days ago is really stable on my two Linux
machines (Red Hat v7.1 and v7.2). At least it should be released as 1.05
Beta or something.
An update on the Web site frontpage is a good idea IMHO.
--
"I like ants, in chocolate. Crunch, hu." --unknown
--
/\___/\
"Steve Wray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about the 'stable' even-numbered kernel versions?
> How many patch levels were we up to in 2.2 before
> the next 'stable' 2.4 came out? (18 if I recall)
> And then after 2.4 came out there were *still* new patch
> levels for the 'stable' 2.2 kernels
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Boger
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Ian Collier wrote:
> > Phillip Pi wrote:
> > > Actually, CVS is more stable than 1.0.4 release.
> >
> > I said:
> > > Why isn't it released, then?
[snip]
> > make an inter
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:15:40AM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> stable means "not crashing" in my world, not "not changing". I believe
It means both, depending on context. However, I find 1.0.4 rather stable
in that it very rarely crashes.
> it was said that it's not as feature complete as the ol
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Ian Collier wrote:
> Phillip Pi wrote:
> > Actually, CVS is more stable than 1.0.4 release.
>
> I said:
> > Why isn't it released, then?
>
> Phillip Pi replied:
> > It still is under development.
>
> Well, you can't really have it both ways. If it's de
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:57:19 +0100
"Ian Collier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip Pi wrote:
> > Actually, CVS is more stable than 1.0.4 release.
>
> I said:
> > Why isn't it released, then?
>
> Phillip Pi replied:
> > It still is under development.
>
> Well, you can't really have it both wa
Please don't top-post as it is *much* easier to follow the thread of
conversation if it all appears in the right order and I wouldn't have
to do so much work in rearranging it...
Phillip Pi wrote:
> Actually, CVS is more stable than 1.0.4 release.
I said:
> Why isn't it released, then?
Phillip
10 matches
Mail list logo
