On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
>
>
> I've read most of what you guys have up there so far. Before I knew
> about it, I was pretty much lost. Very much looking forward to the
> final product.
>
> My favorite thing about Lift is the use of Snippets. I work in PHP
> primarily
I've read most of what you guys have up there so far. Before I knew
about it, I was pretty much lost. Very much looking forward to the
final product.
My favorite thing about Lift is the use of Snippets. I work in PHP
primarily without a framework, and I don't mind writing SQL but it's
always
Very very cool !
On Jan 7, 10:37 pm, "David Pollak"
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm going to be giving a presentation on Lift to eBig (East Bay Innovation
> Group) on January 21st.
> Seehttp://www.ebig.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&PageID=481
>
> Bill Venners, Michael Galpin, and I are giving
Lifted,
i'm forwarding this as it may be of general interest to many here.
Best wishes,
--greg
This is to reannounce a selection of Web-based category theory
demonstrations that I've put up at
http://www.j-paine.org/cgi-bin/webcats/webcats.php .
The page contains a number of buttons such as "
But no longer.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Meredith Gregory
wrote:
> Lifted,
>
> My mail to this list seems to be bouncing.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> --greg
>
> --
> L.G. Meredith
> Managing Partner
> Biosimilarity LLC
> 806 55th St NE
> Seattle, WA 98105
>
> +1 206.650.3740
>
> http://biosimilari
Lifted,
My mail to this list seems to be bouncing.
Best wishes,
--greg
--
L.G. Meredith
Managing Partner
Biosimilarity LLC
806 55th St NE
Seattle, WA 98105
+1 206.650.3740
http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becau
Folks,
I'm going to be giving a presentation on Lift to eBig (East Bay Innovation
Group) on January 21st. See
http://www.ebig.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&PageID=481
Bill Venners, Michael Galpin, and I are giving a Scala presentation to the
San Francisco Java Users Group on January 20t
Thanks for posting the presentation. Very informative, plus I love
the chalkboard look and feel!
Dan
On Jan 7, 9:10 am, "David Pollak"
wrote:
> Ramzi,
>
> Remote Actors are fragile. AMQP (RabbitMQ) or ActorD
> (http://code.google.com/p/actord/) are better options. ActorD has the
> advantag
Marc,
Good suggestion. Marius -- do you want to do this... maybe even turn the
pattern into a trait that we can apply over and over?
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Marc Boschma
> wrote:
> Cool code! Works nicely...
> Would it make sense to also add something similar to this fr
I'll look into it.
On Jan 7, 7:38 pm, "David Pollak"
wrote:
> Marc,
>
> Good suggestion. Marius -- do you want to do this... maybe even turn the
> pattern into a trait that we can apply over and over?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Marc Boschma
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Coo
Ramzi,
Remote Actors are fragile. AMQP (RabbitMQ) or ActorD (
http://code.google.com/p/actord/) are better options. ActorD has the
advantage of having a memcached ABI (wire protocol interface) and can make
it easy to migrate logic out of PHP or Rails code into Scala Actors.
Thanks,
David
On W
Derek,
Cool.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
> I just committed some preliminary code for a MappedDecimal field into the
> wip-dcb-decimal-maprec branch. I based it on the rest of the code for
> fields, but I was wondering if someone could take a look at
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Tony Morris wrote:
>
> Jorge Ortiz wrote:
> > You're talking about algebraic data types.
> >
> > The rest of us are discussing classes and inheritance.
> >
> > When someone says that a Dog "is" an Animal, they clearly don't
> > mean "is isomorphic to".
> >
> > --j
I just committed some preliminary code for a MappedDecimal field into the
wip-dcb-decimal-maprec branch. I based it on the rest of the code for
fields, but I was wondering if someone could take a look at the code and
make sure it makes sense. It compiles, but I guessed on some of the "guts"
method
David,
What is the actual status of scala.actors.remote. I mean if you want
to distribute your application, do you still need to use JMS or AMQP
or something like that?
Thx,
Ramzi
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:15 AM, David Pollak
wrote:
> Bob,
> memcached is failure. Using memcached means that the
Hey Bob, less about memcached and more about Lift in general, take a
look at the book, Marius, Derek and I are writing:
http://github.com/tjweir/liftbook/tree/master
We'd love to get your feedback as a PHP guy.
Thanks,
Tyler
On Jan 6, 10:27 pm, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> I'm keeping my eye on Lift
Jorge Ortiz wrote:
> You're talking about algebraic data types.
>
> The rest of us are discussing classes and inheritance.
>
> When someone says that a Dog "is" an Animal, they clearly don't
> mean "is isomorphic to".
>
> --j
>
>
I will make one last ditch effort.
We are talking about Can and Opt
And, by the way, squares and triangles are isomorphic (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_isomorphism).
--j
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Tony Morris wrote:
>
> "related to a combination of Option and Either"
> I'm not sure how I am missing that point since that is exactly the
> code I
You're talking about algebraic data types.
The rest of us are discussing classes and inheritance.
When someone says that a Dog "is" an Animal, they clearly don't mean "is
isomorphic to".
--j
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Tony Morris wrote:
>
> Jorge Ortiz wrote:
> > For most people, "is" do
Warren Henning wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tony Morris
> wrote:
>> not an Option. It was not even close (lack of totality in this
>> test is catastrophic).
>
> Who cares?
>
> >
>
Oliver did when he asked me. I will be seeing him tomorrow in Sydney
where I can clarify any misunderstan
Jorge Ortiz wrote:
> For most people, "is" does not always and exclusively mean
> "bi-implication". You are free to think this way, if you choose,
> but please don't impose your Language Police on us.
>
> --j
For most people, "is" means "is isomorphic to" when talking about data
types. Furthermor
"related to a combination of Option and Either"
I'm not sure how I am missing that point since that is exactly the
code I provided earlier. There is no point, except to assist Oliver in
looking passed these fancy language tricks.
In a pragmatic and therefore, not very useful way, yes Can is like
22 matches
Mail list logo
