[Lift] Re: Lift newbie - Horizontal scaling of Lift servers

On Mar 1, 2:21 am, David Pollak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ikai Lan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I'm looking to learn Lift coming from working with Ruby on Rails for a > > while and I've been voraciously consuming the documentation and > > tutorials that are available on the internet.

[Lift] Re: Issue with http://liftweb.net site design (IE7 / Opera 9.63)

Done. --j On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Tim Perrett wrote: > > Guys, > > I've just committed the CSS patches for liftweb.net - I've also > updated some of the content. > > Can someone get that onto the live box please? > > I've checked it in Opera, FF, Safari and IE7 > > Thanks > > Tim > > >

[Lift] Re: Lift newbie - Horizontal scaling of Lift servers

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ikai Lan wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking to learn Lift coming from working with Ruby on Rails for a > while and I've been voraciously consuming the documentation and > tutorials that are available on the internet. There are a few things I > really like about Lift s

[Lift] Lift newbie - Horizontal scaling of Lift servers

Hi, I'm looking to learn Lift coming from working with Ruby on Rails for a while and I've been voraciously consuming the documentation and tutorials that are available on the internet. There are a few things I really like about Lift so far: - Out of the box Comet support - Rapid development (in

[Lift] Re: Configurable JQuery Version?

GC stuff is not dependent on the underlying JS library. On Feb 28, 7:36 pm, Tim Perrett wrote: > Ah right excellent - I was not sure if any of the new GC stuff > *needed* that version or not hence my reason for asking :-) > > Cheers, Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[Lift] Re: Configurable JQuery Version?

Ah right excellent - I was not sure if any of the new GC stuff *needed* that version or not hence my reason for asking :-) Cheers, Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this gro

[Lift] Re: OS X lift installer

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Josh Suereth wrote: > I feel obligated to note that this was indeed an issue with maven itself. > I believe it's fixed in the most recent release of Maven (2.0.10) [see > here ]. Please upgrade and > let me know if it c

[Lift] Re: OS X lift installer

I feel obligated to note that this was indeed an issue with maven itself. I believe it's fixed in the most recent release of Maven (2.0.10) [see here]. Please upgrade and let me know if it continues so I can open many JIRAs! -Josh On Sat, Feb 28, 2009

[Lift] Re: OS X lift installer

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Josh Suereth wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, David Pollak < > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jon Hancock wrote: >> >>> >>> thanks. based on your above mention that maven is web aware and some >>> com

[Lift] Re: Configurable JQuery Version?

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Tim Perrett wrote: > > Guys, > > I have a lift app that since our 1.3.2 update has broken a bunch of > stuff. Id imagine im not the only person in this pickle and wonder if > there is a way we could possibly make JQuery a configurable version? > > Perhaps LiftRules

[Lift] Configurable JQuery Version?

Guys, I have a lift app that since our 1.3.2 update has broken a bunch of stuff. Id imagine im not the only person in this pickle and wonder if there is a way we could possibly make JQuery a configurable version? Perhaps LiftRules.jqueryVersion ? Thoughts? Cheers, Tim --~--~-~--~~-

[Lift] Re: Issue with http://liftweb.net site design (IE7 / Opera 9.63)

Guys, I've just committed the CSS patches for liftweb.net - I've also updated some of the content. Can someone get that onto the live box please? I've checked it in Opera, FF, Safari and IE7 Thanks Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you

[Lift] Re: OS X lift installer

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, David Pollak wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jon Hancock wrote: > >> >> thanks. based on your above mention that maven is web aware and some >> comment I read from David Pollak that his demo didn't go so well when >> he lacked an internet connection