[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

My point was that so far Lift seems to be fine without it. When a problem crops up for which AOP appears to be the best or only solution, then it will be worth considering it. Until then, it is only change for change's sake, IMO, otherwise known as feature creep. I'm a fan of Occam: don't over

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committers

On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:25 PM, "Charles F. Munat" wrote: > > I'd have to second David on this. If it ain't broke... > Keep coding until it is? Although the standard use case in java for aspects is not so much needed in scala, I wouldn't throw it out completely. It's another tool that coul

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committers

Welcome Jonas! On the other topic of this thread: AOP has its place, but I think that Lift has done an excellent job of providing hooks into the processing of requests at appropriate points, which to me greatly reduces and I'd argue eliminates any benefit from AOP for Lift. Derek On Mon, Mar 30

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

I'd have to second David on this. If it ain't broke... David Pollak wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Lee Mighdoll > wrote: > > Welcome Jonas! > > I'd been thinking that some judicious use of aspectJ might be a nice > fit for lift. Rumo

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

Welcome, Jonas! David Pollak wrote: > Folks, > > Please join me in welcoming Jonas as a Lift committer. I had the > pleasure of meeting Jonas as QCon in London this month. Jonas, Tim, and > I went out a grabbed a few pints and chatted. I think Jonas has a lot > to contribute to Lift. > >

[Lift] Re: Disappearing white space

Will do. In the meantime, a workaround is to use non-breaking spaces: This & That  :: My Site Chas. David Pollak wrote: > Please file a defect and assign it to me. > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Charles F. Munat > wrote: > > > When I add a title in a head e

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

On Mar 30, 9:53 pm, David Pollak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Lee Mighdoll wrote: > > > Welcome Jonas! > > > I'd been thinking that some judicious use of aspectJ might be a nice fit > > for lift.  Rumor has it you know something about aspects... > > AspectJ over my dead body.  :-)

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Josh Suereth wrote: > I think AspectJ compiler currently pukes on scala classes anyway (or at > least it did when Miles set up aspectj as a workaround the Eclipse JDT). That was certainly the case quite recently ... I filed a bug against AspectJ which as far as I

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

I think AspectJ compiler currently pukes on scala classes anyway (or at least it did when Miles set up aspectj as a workaround the Eclipse JDT). So... no dice for AspectJ + Scala without using a Java "glue" class. On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Lee Mighdoll wrote: > Certainly, maintaining an a

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

Certainly, maintaining an aspect compiler in the project would be hassle. Probably not worth debating AOP unless there's a case that really calls for it. My guess is that most uses of aspects will eventually get rolled into scala compiler plugins, anyway, but that aspectJ could be an interim strat

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Lee Mighdoll wrote: > Welcome Jonas! > > I'd been thinking that some judicious use of aspectJ might be a nice fit > for lift. Rumor has it you know something about aspects... > AspectJ over my dead body. :-) I think AOP is a dangerous and generally very bad th

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

Welcome Jonas! I'd been thinking that some judicious use of aspectJ might be a nice fit for lift. Rumor has it you know something about aspects... Lee On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:15 AM, marius d. wrote: > > Welcome Jonas ! > > On Mar 30, 7:52 pm, David Pollak > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Plea

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

Welcome Jonas ! On Mar 30, 7:52 pm, David Pollak wrote: > Folks, > > Please join me in welcoming Jonas as a Lift committer.  I had the pleasure > of meeting Jonas as QCon in London this month.  Jonas, Tim, and I went out a > grabbed a few pints and chatted.  I think Jonas has a lot to contribute

[Lift] Re: Strange issue with file uploads

I just put a guard in the fileUpload function handler. I'll check in a solution once GitHub is back up On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > I just started seeing this tonight and I'm not sure what changed. I have a > form that uses a fileUpload, and it used to be that if

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

Welcome Jonas! :) Great to have you aboard! On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:58 PM, TylerWeir wrote: > > w00p w00p! > > Welcome! > > On Mar 30, 12:52 pm, David Pollak > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Please join me in welcoming Jonas as a Lift committer. I had the > pleasure > > of meeting Jonas as QCon

[Lift] Fwd: [bayfp] Next Meeting: RabbitMQ, Wednesday April 8th @ 7:30PM

Folks, The excellent RabbitMQ folks will be presenting at BayFP this month. Come on down. Thanks, David -- Forwarded message -- From: Mike Wells Date: Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM Subject: [bayfp] Next Meeting: RabbitMQ, Wednesday April 8th @ 7:30PM To: ba...@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: Dynamic Image generation / HttpServletResponse

On Mar 26, 12:14 am, David Pollak wrote: > Here's some code to serve an image out of the database. > ... > Does this help? Yes it does. I've got it working now. Thanks, Thomas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

[Lift] Re: Derek's #1

Yes, very helpful! Thanks so much. On Mar 30, 12:58 pm, TylerWeir wrote: > > Wow. I can't guarantee that I'll always be helpful, but I'll keep trying :) > > You've been super helpful. > > On Mar 30, 12:39 pm, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM, David Pollak < >

[Lift] Re: Derek's #1

> Wow. I can't guarantee that I'll always be helpful, but I'll keep trying :) You've been super helpful. On Mar 30, 12:39 pm, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM, David Pollak < > > > > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > > It's almost the end of the

[Lift] Re: Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committer s

w00p w00p! Welcome! On Mar 30, 12:52 pm, David Pollak wrote: > Folks, > > Please join me in welcoming Jonas as a Lift committer.  I had the pleasure > of meeting Jonas as QCon in London this month.  Jonas, Tim, and I went out a > grabbed a few pints and chatted.  I think Jonas has a lot to cont

[Lift] Welcome Jonas Bonér to the Lift committers

Folks, Please join me in welcoming Jonas as a Lift committer. I had the pleasure of meeting Jonas as QCon in London this month. Jonas, Tim, and I went out a grabbed a few pints and chatted. I think Jonas has a lot to contribute to Lift. So, please join me in welcoming him! Thanks, David --

[Lift] Re: Disappearing white space

Please file a defect and assign it to me. On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > When I add a title in a head element to a template that is surrounded by > the default template, and the title has a character entity or a lift tag > in it, the white space surrounding that ent

[Lift] Re: Derek's #1

Wow. I can't guarantee that I'll always be helpful, but I'll keep trying :) On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM, David Pollak < feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, > > It's almost the end of the most active month ever on the Lift list. I'm > happy to report that Derek is the #1 poster th

[Lift] Re: Derek's #1

Keep on Rockin' Derek ! On Mar 30, 7:15 pm, David Pollak wrote: > Folks, > > It's almost the end of the most active month ever on the Lift list.  I'm > happy to report that Derek is the #1 poster this month.  He's been helping > lots of folks and improving Lift. > > So, welcome to all the new fo

[Lift] Derek's #1

Folks, It's almost the end of the most active month ever on the Lift list. I'm happy to report that Derek is the #1 poster this month. He's been helping lots of folks and improving Lift. So, welcome to all the new folks who have joined the list and starting asking questions. A big round of tha

[Lift] Re: importing model - permanently hidden?

I haven't tried it. I just defined the companion objects and removed the import statement and everything is working now. Thanks for your reply, Derek. On Mar 30, 1:26 am, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > I don't have an answer, but does it work if you import model._ ? > > Derek > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2

[Lift] Re: scala:console and then boot call hangs

Yeah, I'm on Windows XP. The Scala interpreter isn't the best in the Windows XP command prompt anyway (especially when you press up to try to edit a really long line). On Mar 30, 8:03 am, Josh Suereth wrote: > Are you on windows?  I believe we haven't fixed mvn scala:console for > windows yet.

[Lift] Re: lift on vista

Thx! Entering 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost did the trick.. :) On Mar 30, 8:21 am, "marius d." wrote: > Does it work if you puthttp://127.0.0.1:8080? > > if it does you need to add > 127.0.0.01        localhost > > in your c:/windows/sys32/drivers/etc/hosts > > Br's, > Marius > > On Mar 29, 6:2

[Lift] Re: annoying blanks at the line ends - another conversion error in the html version

Are you talking about the Getting Started doc? I just tested the PDF and I don't get extra newlines or spaces in either of the archetype create listings. The HTML version has some issues with both spacing and quotes, but I haven't figured out how to cajole tex4ht into producing proper output. Dere

[Lift] Re: scala:console and then boot call hangs

Are you on windows? I believe we haven't fixed mvn scala:console for windows yet. DavidB will be able to give you a better estimate of when this will be fixed, or what the exact cause may be. -Josh On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:30 PM, bradford wrote: > > I feel like I'm spamming the mailing list

[Lift] Re: annoying blanks at the line ends - another conversion error in the html version

Indeed I had this issue as well. One positive is it makes you look at one line individually. :) On Mar 29, 4:14 pm, "claudius.haec...@googlemail.com" wrote: > the first maven call contains superfluous line breaks. This doesn't > look very nice. The second maven call contains superfluous blanks.