should http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites-snapshots/liftweb/scaladocs/index.html
be something other than nothing?
Is there a better way to get snapshot scaladocs?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to
hi, thanks.. i'm looking for the API documentation???
On Dec 1, 5:08 pm, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
Tryhttp://scala-tools.org/mvnsites-snapshots/liftweb/instead of with
index.html
-Ross
On Dec 1, 2009, at 8:01 PM, E. Biggs wrote:
shouldhttp://scala-tools.org/mvnsites
lift_page = F9839766178183WH;
// ]]
/script/body
/html
On Aug 26, 9:58 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, E. Biggs tacoban...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks David! My pages now render - although broken... the cause
appears to be a failed head
Many thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi there,
I just did a mvn -U jetty:run
and my site that I know was working fine before is now broken with
this error displayed in the browser for any url:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: schema_reference.4: Failed to read
schema document 'http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/xhtml1-
gracefully if the
xsd cannot be loaded.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Justin Reardon
justin.rear...@gmail.comwrote:
Probably caused by this if you're in a dev environment:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/t/90750187a6c29c2c
On Aug 26, 9:36 pm, E. Biggs tacoban...@gmail.com
from there.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, E. Biggs tacoban...@gmail.com wrote:
I have extended Mega*ProtoUser to achieve cookie-based perpetual
login.. and it was fairly easy to do except I ended up having to do
something hackish simply because there are two private object members
I have extended Mega*ProtoUser to achieve cookie-based perpetual
login.. and it was fairly easy to do except I ended up having to do
something hackish simply because there are two private object members
in the class that are core to the functionality I've extended.
Namely:
private object
Actually, you're right.. I suppose I got too focused on how I wanted
to do it and didn't think of how it could be done more pleasingly
this seems to work great:
override def currentUserId: Box[String] = {
super.currentUserId match {
case Full(_) = super.currentUserId
attn beautiful, generous lift gurus,
I've spawned off a scheduling actor that spend most of its time
asleep; it just wakes up to tell another actor when to do things i.e:
actor{ loop{ sleep( an hour ); mainActor ! do something }}. Works
like a champ except for one thing: jetty can't get
1, 3:40 pm, E. Biggs tacoban...@gmail.com wrote:
attn beautiful, generous lift gurus,
I've spawned off a scheduling actor that spend most of its time
asleep; it just wakes up to tell another actor when to do things i.e:
actor{ loop{ sleep( an hour ); mainActor ! do something }}. Works
Any Ideas? I've tried distilling this down to just a most basic
example:
object BoolTest extends BoolTest with KeyedMetaMapper[Long, BoolTest]
{
override def dbTableName = BoolTest
override def fieldOrder = id :: testField :: Nil
}
class BoolTest extends KeyedMapper[Long, BoolTest] {
def
)
at scala.actors.FJTaskRunner.scanWhileIdling(Unknown Source)
at scala.actors.FJTaskRunner.run(Unknown Source)
Cleanup action completed
On Jun 3, 12:46 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Is there an exception? If so could you post the entire trace?
Cheers, Tim
On Jun 3, 3:24 am, E. Biggs tacoban
When I try to apply By to a MappedBoolean like so:
Table.findAll(By(Table.booleanField, false)); derby is unhappy and
bombs out on some sql with this kind of where clause:
WHERE Table.booleanfield = ?
Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? I'm using 1.1-SNAPSHOT
Hey thanks for the suggestions.. although I figured out what my
problem is and it's a bit frustrating...
What happened was that lift, as you probably know is all about xhtml..
which is incompatible with google maps (supposedly because it doesn't
support document.write or something supposedly?)
, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
I use Google maps (but very basically) on several sites with lift using
XHTML 1.1 with no problem. What is it hassling you with?
Chas.
E. Biggs wrote:
Hey thanks for the suggestions.. although I figured out what my
problem is and it's a bit frustrating
16 matches
Mail list logo