[Lift] web site critique

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
http://liftweb.net/download.html needs to tell me what (tf :-) to do next if i /do/ have mvn installed already. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this grou

[Lift] intro mvn critique

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
hi, i think there should be a much shorter mvn command to get started. i do not know maven, but would it not be possible to wrap up all of the long-winded jiggery-pokery (below) into a shorter thing that expanded / downloaded something that ran that command? it is just not good user experience for

Re: [Lift] web site critique

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
hi, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:32 PM, David Pollak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Raoul Duke wrote: >> http://liftweb.net/download.html >> needs to tell me what (tf :-) to do next if i /do/ have mvn installed >> already. > http://liftweb.net/docs/getting_s

Re: [Lift] intro mvn critique

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
> I wish, but no.  I've written my own shell script. ugh. could the html verison perhaps be improved to not have extra blank lines which prevent me from successfully copy and pasting it into my shell? :-) http://liftweb.net/docs/getting_started/mod_master.html#x1-40001.2 sincerely. -- You rec

[Lift] buildr?

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
whatever came of buildr for lift? i haven't stumbled across the answer googling yet, but i'm still checking... thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from th

Re: [Lift] buildr?

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
hi, >> whatever came of buildr for lift? i haven't stumbled across the answer >> googling yet, but i'm still checking... > > We're not going to support Buildr for Lift. Adding Ruby into the mix is a > non-starter from my perspective. There is increasing sbt support for > Lift-based projects. th

Re: [Lift] buildr?

2010-01-21 Thread Raoul Duke
> At this point, we're official only supporting Lift with Maven.  We've got > limited resources and this is where we're putting them.  Maven is mature, > works well in most cases, and integrates with IDEs very effectively.  I > expect in 6-12 months, we'll deprecate Maven in favor of sbt, but not t

Re: [Lift] buildr?

2010-01-22 Thread Raoul Duke
> Don't know about buildr, but we've been using Gradle for a while. It > comes with a Scala plugin. ok, i think we should all admit that this is just getting funny. :) sincerely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group,

[Lift] anybody used OPA?

2010-02-22 Thread Raoul Duke
http://mlstate.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at

Re: [Lift] anybody used OPA?

2010-02-22 Thread Raoul Duke
> This is related to Lift how? It appears to be a framework itself... ja, i figure people who use Lift are the kinds of people who might have their ear to the ground for other approaches to the web problem, and might have insight into Competitor X, Y, or Z. i've certainly seen people talk about o

Re: [Lift] [urgent] Master is fundamentally broken!!!!!!

2010-02-24 Thread Raoul Duke
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > This is no replacement for unit tests, but is more a lightweight > integration test that exercises a big part of the Lift stack imho a high-level test is way more useful for determining if the system is basically working, because

Re: [Lift] [urgent] Master is fundamentally broken!!!!!!

2010-02-24 Thread Raoul Duke
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Raoul Duke wrote: > imho a high-level test is way more useful for determining if the > system is basically working, because it is so end-to-end; no, it > doesn't tell you precisely what to fix like a unit test would, but the > code-written-to-c

Re: [Lift] [urgent] Master is fundamentally broken!!!!!!

2010-02-24 Thread Raoul Duke
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:51 AM, David Pollak wrote: >> in other words: are there any 'professional' Test/QA (note those are >> different roles!) people on the Lift team/list? > So, I don't think we need additional QA.  I think the existing processes > work just fine. very good to hear it is so

[Lift] Re: A Critique On Lift

2009-10-22 Thread Raoul Duke
hi, i take issue with the following: > misunderstood. They are NOT "controllers" .. they are simple > constructs to allow dynamic markup to be injected in the template. Of > course one can abuse anything in any framework but this is besides the > point. my personal take is that if you are a res

[Lift] Re: [scala] typed browser scripting languages?

2009-02-19 Thread Raoul Duke
> Many thanks for this feedback. Do you know of any connection between the > HaXe codebase and the skydeck folks' ocamljs? i've never heard of such a connection, fwiw. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread Raoul Duke
> Between Scala and Lift, ScalaCheck and Specs, Eclipse and Buildr, Jetty and > JavaRebel, it's amazing to see how far the tools have evolved in the 2 years > I've been following Scala. so... any good concise instructions on getting properly set up with all those tools? as wonderful as it all sou

[Lift] anybody looked at the 280north stuff?

2009-04-21 Thread Raoul Duke
http://280north.com/blog/2009/02/announcing-atlas/ i'm curious how it really pans out. sincerely. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegro