On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Just looking back over the list - where are we too with the current
Record implementation?
I want to factor out some localization functionality into a
ProtoTranslation style system, but for Record rather than
Also, it would be great it Lift1.1 included all of the
necessary .js, .css and class files for the new MenuWidget
I have not had the chance to actually work with lift yet and have been doing
a lot of reading, but I have not read how lift currently handles script and
css resources? Does it
, at 3:11 AM, David Pollak wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add,
please speak up now.
Improved documentation: better VScalaDoc coverage as well as better
tutorial and cook-book documentation.
Improved J2EE support including JTA and Portlets
Have you looked at Windmill?
http://www.getwindmill.com/
From what I've heard it's pretty cool.
Chas.
David Pollak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Bill Venners b...@artima.com
mailto:b...@artima.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David Pollak
- is that embedding portlets in snippets
and/or creating portlets (rather than servlets)?
I'm thinking having Lift being exposed as a Portlet as well as a Servlet.
Marc
On 02/04/2009, at 3:11 AM, David Pollak wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
Also, it would be great it Lift1.1 included all of the
necessary .js, .css and class files for the new MenuWidget
On Apr 3, 3:42 am, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
Have you looked at Windmill?
http://www.getwindmill.com/
From what I've heard it's pretty cool.
Chas.
David Pollak
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Improved testing framework and better testing support when running in test
mode.
Can you elaborate on what your plans are for this?
Thanks.
Bill
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Bill Venners b...@artima.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Improved testing framework and better testing support when running in
test
mode.
Can you elaborate on what your
of these
features).
-Josh
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
speak up now.
- Improved documentation: better VScalaDoc coverage as well as better
tutorial
is in the context of Lift. There's not
much you can't do simply by defining a DispatchPF or a page with SiteMap.
-Josh
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add,
please
Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Josh Suereth joshua.suer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My resources are pretty limited, but I'd love to at least contribute
what I can to the OSG...
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:Folks,I think we've
got our Lift 1.1
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Bill Venners b...@artima.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Improved testing
Ok no worries - personally, I dont have any burning need for it right
this moment but I could certainly make serious use of it within the
next month.
Cheers, Tim
On Apr 2, 7:10 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim,
It's on my backlog. Right now I'm working on a preso for
+10 for documentation effort. Speaking from the noob perspective, the
documentation is the biggest barrier to entry for Lift. Currently
there are 3 places to get lift documentation:
-Get Started Tutorial
-Lift Book
-Lift Wiki
The first two sources are excellent, but the last one is bit
I gotta be honest, with April Fools, I was scared to click on
goatrodeo.org...
On Apr 1, 12:11 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
speak up now.
- Improved documentation: better
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I gotta be honest, with April Fools, I was scared to click on
goatrodeo.org...
:-)
On Apr 1, 12:11 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone
?)
How'd you get the name goat rodeo?! lol
Lee
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.comwrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
speak up now.
- Improved documentation: better VScalaDoc coverage as well
a redirect response?
And possibly:
* Backing store support for Voldemort (or does that come through goat
rodeo?)
How'd you get the name goat rodeo?! lol
Lee
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list
tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I gotta be honest, with April Fools, I was scared to click on
goatrodeo.org...
:-)
On Apr 1, 12:11 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add,
please
speak
be deprecated in favor of Joda Time
alternatives.
Mapper should continue to support Date/Time.
--j
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.comwrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
speak up now.
- Improved
...@gmail.comwrote:
Folks,
I think we've got our Lift 1.1 list. If anyone has anything to add, please
speak up now.
- Improved documentation: better VScalaDoc coverage as well as better
tutorial and cook-book documentation.
- Improved J2EE support including JTA and Portlets.
- Finish Record
I think your right Jorge... 2.8 brings some important changes that
could quite possibly have some pretty significant breaking changes in
the Lift API.
I also agree with the JodaTime in record/field, sounds like perfect
sense.
Cheers, Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
+1 Anything to get away from that damn Java Date/Calendar crap.
Agreed on need to review API.
Chas.
Timothy Perrett wrote:
I think your right Jorge... 2.8 brings some important changes that
could quite possibly have some pretty significant breaking changes in
the Lift API.
I also agree
I've been thinking about browser-server data sync for use in my next
project. Sync is potentially more interesting than RPC style ajax,
especially for rich clients, and I think sync could be a grand thing to add
to lift.
The basic idea is like this. A javascript client subscribes to a set of
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
