Heiko Seeberger writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 February 2010 22:11, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) is the cleanest solution since the choice of logging backend is made
>> explicit. But this requires people to change their poms in order to get
>> any logging.
>>
>
> Let's go for 2) because in real
Hi,
On 5 February 2010 22:11, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
>
> 2) is the cleanest solution since the choice of logging backend is made
> explicit. But this requires people to change their poms in order to get
> any logging.
>
Let's go for 2) because in real-world projects people will have to adju
(Moved from committers list)
Hi,
A fix is on RB (http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/198/) for Issue 309
that changes the Lift internal logging to always go through Slf4j (a
logging facade that provides a uniform logging interface to different
logging backends such as Log4j and logback)
Since slf4
