On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:24 AM, aw <anth...@whitford.com> wrote: > I think I discovered that my issue is related to the fact that the > code is part of a CometActor/CometListener, and it sounds like S isn't > fully functional from this perspective... My clue was the > inStatefulScope_? method documentation. > > I do think I managed to work around my specific issue, but I don't > fully understand this, and I'm not sure if this change in behavior was > intentional. >
There is no HTTP request within the scope of a CometActor. This is the defined behavior. If you were somehow able to access a Req or other part of an HTTP request within the CometActor scope in a prior version of Lift, this was a bug. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
