Thanks again for the cool details. I now get it.
Thanks.
- Debasish
On Mar 4, 9:48 pm, David Pollak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:26 AM, debasish wrote:
>
> > David -
>
> > Thanks a lot for the clear explanation.
>
> > Just curious - do you think the previous implementation philosophy of
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:26 AM, debasish wrote:
>
> David -
>
> Thanks a lot for the clear explanation.
>
> Just curious - do you think the previous implementation philosophy of
> controllers, sessions and pages as actors with state changes being
> done only through messages was a more FP oriente
David -
Thanks a lot for the clear explanation.
Just curious - do you think the previous implementation philosophy of
controllers, sessions and pages as actors with state changes being
done only through messages was a more FP oriented approach ? And that
the actor model broke down since Session
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:59 AM, debasish wrote:
>
> Dear All -
>
> I have had a look at Lift quite some time ago. I remember referring to
> this excellent post by David Pollak on the usage of actors in Lift
> (http://blog.lostlake.org/index.php?/archives/59-How-lift-uses-Scala-
> actors.html). No
