Cool.
Br's,
Marius
On Jan 12, 9:50 pm, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> I like it a lot. Eliminates recent confusion about submit() in ajaxForm,
> prettier and semantically more correct than hidden fields and supports
> multiple actions. What's not to like?
>
> alex
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:39 PM,
Most likely I'll commit it today in master as it was approved by
review board.
Br's,
Marius
On Jan 14, 9:53 am, Adam Warski wrote:
> I would of course be very +1 to include the ajaxSubmit :). Thanks for the
> work.
>
> This looks a bit different to the button I tried before, maybe you have a
>
On Jan 15, 11:05 am, Adam Warski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried the trunk version and again it almost works :)
>
> 1. the RequestVars aren't preserved for the ajax request. I think this can be
> fixed by replacing in SHtml:692 the NFuncHolder with a call to
> contextFuncBuilder, so the method wou
On Jan 15, 5:59 pm, Adam Warski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Oh yeah contextFuncBuider ... good catch. I'll update today.
>
> thanks :)
done.
>
>
>
> >> 2. The button will work only with full ajax-forms right? So forms wrapped
> >> with ajaxForm(...)? My initial use-case was for adding some ajax but
Ok I just looked on your code. The problem is that you put the ajax
button inside the form and there is not reason for that.
I changed your code to something like:
bind("cont", containerTemplate,
"name" -> { println("bind container name " + cont.name);
SHtml.text(cont.name,
On Jan 16, 12:02 pm, Adam Warski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Ok I just looked on your code. The problem is that you put the ajax
> > button inside the form and there is not reason for that.
>
> Well, unless I do want the button to be inside the form ;) (for
> user-experience/layout reasons). Although
On Jan 16, 7:08 pm, Adam Warski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >> Hmm yes I wondered if the order in which the functions are bound is
> >> significant, but my experiments showed that it's not simply a "first
> >> bound, first called" principle. So I don't quite get it yet why it doesn't
> >> work.
>
> >
Hi,
Something puzzled me about this as in firebug the parameters order was
correct. So here is the explanation why it doesn't for with your code:
1. HTTP parameters MAY arrive in an unpredictable order into the
servlet. Container may alter their order due to use of maps etc, or
browsers may even
Hello,
I tried the trunk version and again it almost works :)
1. the RequestVars aren't preserved for the ajax request. I think this can be
fixed by replacing in SHtml:692 the NFuncHolder with a call to
contextFuncBuilder, so the method would look like this:
def doit = makeFormElementWithName(
Hello,
> Oh yeah contextFuncBuider ... good catch. I'll update today.
thanks :)
>>
>> 2. The button will work only with full ajax-forms right? So forms wrapped
>> with ajaxForm(...)? My initial use-case was for adding some ajax buttons to
>> normal forms (submitted with a normal http request)
> I kinda doubt that as I tested with a bunch of form fields. In the
> ajax request the function ID of the ajax function was always the last
> in the parameters and functions are evaluated in canonical order (for
> the same owner). But I think you sent me your source code location and
> I need to
Hello,
>> Hmm yes I wondered if the order in which the functions are bound is
>> significant, but my experiments showed that it's not simply a "first bound,
>> first called" principle. So I don't quite get it yet why it doesn't work.
>
> We rely on JQuery (or other underlying library) to send t
Hello,
> Right ... and it's not even a hack ... css is the right way of
> building layout not really the html. Putting buttons "in the form" ar
> giving this perception in the page doesn't mean that the button has to
> be physically in the form element (at least that's the way I see
> it.).
actua
Hello,
> 1. HTTP parameters MAY arrive in an unpredictable order into the
> servlet. Container may alter their order due to use of maps etc, or
> browsers may even alter it. The point is that parameters order for
> "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" is not specified.
didn't know that - something
14 matches
Mail list logo
