Ah never mind... ahem strings are not xml and therefore trying to add
an attribute to them makes no sense...
On Sep 18, 12:58 pm, Ewan wrote:
> I'd be happy to do that. One thing though is that the main binding
> article still has examples of the old way which needs an update i.e.
>
> #
>
I'd be happy to do that. One thing though is that the main binding
article still has examples of the old way which needs an update i.e.
#
# User name
#
which brings me on to a related issue where by -%> does compile if the
argument is a String where as -> does. Is this intende
Or you can maybe insert it in the main binding article.
-
Timothy Perrett wrote:
The wiki is open for all to edit.
Can I suggest you call it "How To: Preserve binding attributes"
Cheers, Tim
On 18 Sep 2009, at 10:25, Ewan wrote:
>
> I asked this only the
The wiki is open for all to edit.
Can I suggest you call it "How To: Preserve binding attributes"
Cheers, Tim
On 18 Sep 2009, at 10:25, Ewan wrote:
>
> I asked this only the day before (and got the answer) - might be worth
> popping it on the wiki now.
>
> On Sep 17, 9:58 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim
I asked this only the day before (and got the answer) - might be worth
popping it on the wiki now.
On Sep 17, 9:58 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
> DPP added an attribute-preserving arrow: -%>
> Then you can use unprefixed attributes.
>
> -
>
> Bryan wrote:
>
>
DPP added an attribute-preserving arrow: -%>
Then you can use unprefixed attributes.
-
Bryan wrote:
I am trying to update an old lift application I wrote using
1.1-SNAPSHOT. It looks like bind is no longer keeping the attributes
I've defined in the template.
