Re: [Lift] Re: Lift-OpenID should default to openid_identifier for post param name

2010-02-08 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Erkki Lindpere wrote: > Ok, I'll do that. > > BTW. As I'm doing a bit of research how providers support Attribute- > Exchange, it seems their behaviour and supported schemas can be quite > different (for example, Google ignores optional attributes). So the > functio

[Lift] Re: Lift-OpenID should default to openid_identifier for post param name

2010-02-06 Thread Erkki Lindpere
Ok, I'll do that. BTW. As I'm doing a bit of research how providers support Attribute- Exchange, it seems their behaviour and supported schemas can be quite different (for example, Google ignores optional attributes). So the function might need a parameter from which the openid provider can be det

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift-OpenID should default to openid_identifier for post param name

2010-02-05 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Erkki Lindpere writes: > Thanks! > > I'm now trying to customize the attribute-exchange and noticed that it > is embedded in a longish method. I think it would be good if this was > extracted to a method (maybe: def reqAttributeExchange: > Option[FetchRequest] ?) so that ax info could be modified

[Lift] Re: Lift-OpenID should default to openid_identifier for post param name

2010-02-05 Thread Erkki Lindpere
Thanks! I'm now trying to customize the attribute-exchange and noticed that it is embedded in a longish method. I think it would be good if this was extracted to a method (maybe: def reqAttributeExchange: Option[FetchRequest] ?) so that ax info could be modified without digging into the rest of th