David Pollak writes:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Timothy Perrett
> wrote:
>
>> Jeppe,
>>
>> Certainly 2 has to be the way to go. We can add stuff to the
>> archetypes to ease this process for users. Moreover, we could add
>> specific lift modules that carried the right dependencies and boo
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Jeppe,
>
> Certainly 2 has to be the way to go. We can add stuff to the
> archetypes to ease this process for users. Moreover, we could add
> specific lift modules that carried the right dependencies and boot
> wire up to save the users writ
Jeppe,
Certainly 2 has to be the way to go. We can add stuff to the
archetypes to ease this process for users. Moreover, we could add
specific lift modules that carried the right dependencies and boot
wire up to save the users writing boilerplate. i.e.:
+ lift-logging
\ - lift-log4j
\ - lift-logb
