Interesting - i've not explored that in 2.8...
Personally, i've been wanting to get scala-migrations integrated into
the lift dev process for ages... this SQL project might be a great bed-
fellow for it.
2.8 is becoming more attractive by the day...
Cheers, Tim
On Feb 24, 8:29 pm, Jim Barrows
On Feb 24, 12:47 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
> We're currently using Rails migrations and I've been thinking if
> putting migrations into the app is really the right approach? What
> happens if migrations fail? It's not easy for the app itself to
> rollback to the previous version :-)
There i
I've pinged Max and he's open to integration with Lift... do I have any
takers?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Timothy Perrett
wrote:
> Interesting - i've not explored that in 2.8...
>
> Personally, i've been wanting to get scala-migrations
I'm not keen on the migrations view of the world.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:38 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
> I've pinged Max and he's open to integration with Lift... do I have any
> takers?
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Timothy Perrett
> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting - i've not explored that in 2.8...
>>
>> Personally, i've been wanting to get s
Whilst I totally take that argument, more often than not I find migrations can
be a useful aid.
Cheers, Tim
On 24 Feb 2010, at 20:47, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
> That's true.
>
> We're currently using Rails migrations and I've been thinking if
> putting migrations into the app is really the r
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, aw wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 12:47 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
>> We're currently using Rails migrations and I've been thinking if
>> putting migrations into the app is really the right approach? What
>> happens if migrations fail? It's not easy for the app itself
