Re: [Lift] Re: field without mapper and Form validation

2010-03-09 Thread Francois Armand
Le 09/03/2010 21:27, David Pollak a écrit : [...] Does this help? Yes, clearly, it seems to be what I was looking for. I missed at first in lift example, until Jeppe point it to me. With your explanation, it really looks like it's what I need :) One of my open tickets is to provide docum

Re: [Lift] Re: field without mapper and Form validation

2010-03-09 Thread David Pollak
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Francois wrote: > Le 09/03/2010 10:12, Francois a écrit : > > Hello guys, >> >> >> I'm often using forms without anything to do persistence and RDBMS >> related, but I would like to be able to use Fields (StringField, >> EmailField, my owns, etc), validation, erro

Re: [Lift] Re: field without mapper and Form validation

2010-03-09 Thread Ross Mellgren
I think you could use plain Record and MetaRecord to do this. -Ross On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Francois wrote: >> Le 09/03/2010 10:12, Francois a écrit : >>> >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> >>> I'm often using forms without anything to do

Re: [Lift] Re: field without mapper and Form validation

2010-03-09 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Francois wrote: > Le 09/03/2010 10:12, Francois a écrit : >> >> Hello guys, >> >> >> I'm often using forms without anything to do persistence and RDBMS >> related, but I would like to be able to use Fields (StringField, >> EmailField, my owns, etc), validation, erro

[Lift] Re: field without mapper and Form validation

2010-03-09 Thread Francois
Le 09/03/2010 10:12, Francois a écrit : Hello guys, I'm often using forms without anything to do persistence and RDBMS related, but I would like to be able to use Fields (StringField, EmailField, my owns, etc), validation, error management, etc. without having everything to manage by hand. A