On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi David,
In my LimitOrder Meta Object, I did:
override def afterCreate
to inform an Actor, everytime a new Order is created. The Actor
David Pollak schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li
mailto:hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li
mailto:hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi David,
In my LimitOrder
It is called outside from an Actor, everytime a new item is created.
thanks.
Where is joinOtherOrders()called within your code?
alex
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li
mailto:hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hey Lifters,
I've some really strange things
Hi David,
In my LimitOrder Meta Object, I did:
override def afterCreate
to inform an Actor, everytime a new Order is created. The Actor than
calls the joinOtherOrders method.
#
I think I understand it now. Cause I'm creating new orders inside the
loop at some point. But still I don' t really
ok, I'll do that. thanks.
Or you can get stack trace information from Thread. I have a utility
function getCaller that does a getStackTrace and then looks at the
proper element of the array. (second, third? I forget)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li
mailto:hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi David,
In my LimitOrder Meta Object, I did:
override def afterCreate
to inform an Actor, everytime a new Order is created. The Actor
than calls the
Hey Lifters,
I've some really strange things going on here. Please consider this
method definition. I've put alot of print debug statements between
other statements. There's a while-loop that only starts, when the given
list (orders) is not empty. It stops when done is set to true. So far,
so
Hannes,
Firstly, I really, really wouldn't write your code like that...
Things of note:
- two defs inside defs... you usually wouldnt do this without a good reason
(like SHtml.submit(whatever _))
- dont use while loops. period. you have a List[T], use foreach if you have a
unit operation
def
Hi Tim,
Hannes,
Firstly, I really, really wouldn't write your code like that...
Things of note:
- two defs inside defs... you usually wouldnt do this without a good reason
(like SHtml.submit(whatever _))
The two defs only make sence together, that's why I put them together in
one def.
Where is joinOtherOrders()called within your code?
alex
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hey Lifters,
I've some really strange things going on here. Please consider this
method definition. I've put alot of print debug statements between
other statements.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hannes hannes.flo...@gmx.li wrote:
Hey Lifters,
How is joinOtherOrders being invoked?
I've some really strange things going on here. Please consider this
method definition. I've put alot of print debug statements between
other statements. There's a
An easy way to determine who's calling is simply to print the call stack by
adding the following line in your method,
(new Exception).printStackTrace
alex
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:24 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Hannes
Or you can get stack trace information from Thread. I have a utility
function getCaller that does a getStackTrace and then looks at the
proper element of the array. (second, third? I forget)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com wrote:
An easy way to determine
13 matches
Mail list logo