Also, interestingly, if you change the order of binding from:
bind("cont", containerTemplate,
"name" -> { println("bind container name " + cont.name);
SHtml.text(cont.name,
(s: String) => {println("set container name " + s); cont.name =
s; }) },
"rooms" -> editRoom _,
Hello,
> Yes please a small app would be best. Please use 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Here it is:
http://github.com/adamw/lift-ajax-submit-test/
Steps to reproduce:
1. checkout from git :)
2. run mvn jetty:run
3. go to http://localhost:8080
4. click "add" once
5. fill in the two fields with some values e.g. "
Hello,
the problem is that some form elements are updated, then the function is
called, and then the rest of the form elements are updated.
My code is more or less something like this:
def editElement(elementTemplate: NodeSeq): NodeSeq = {
container.elements.flatMap { element: Element
Hello,
this *almost* works :).
I modified your code a bit and now I have:
def ajaxButton(text: NodeSeq, formId: String, func: () => JsCmd, attrs:
(String, String)*): Elem = {
attrs.foldLeft(fmapFunc(contextFuncBuilder(func))(name =>
{text}))(_ % _)
}
Now the form submits and
Hello,
trying the solution a bit more I came into another problem which I can't solve
elegantly.
The solution below works nicely for an "add" button, but a "delete" button
causes more problems: the problem is that with "delete", you must know which
element should get deleted.
In a no-ajax sol
Hello,
> I don't think you need a SessionVar. You can just capture the RequestVar's
> value in a local val and refer to that in the closure.
> Basically if I understand correctly, this is a typical scenario where you
> output a form and associate functions with its fields which are to be
> exec
Hello,
>> However for some reason, when I click the button, in the callback I get a
>> new elements RequestVar (so it's initialized to an initial value) and
>> moreover, nothing gets redrawn on the page. What is also quite weird is that
>> the RequestVar is re-initialized, but the snippet insta
I don't think you need a SessionVar. You can just capture the RequestVar's
value in a local val and refer to that in the closure.
Basically if I understand correctly, this is a typical scenario where you
output a form and associate functions with its fields which are to be executed
on the *next*
Hello,
this almost works :).
Right now in my form I have a hidden element where the type of the operation to
execute will be set:
(the name is needed for jquery to set the value, and the id so that I can later
read the value using S).
I bind the button as following:
"addElement" -> > JqAttr(
Hello,
> ajaxButton("Press me would ya'?", SHtml.submitAjaxForm
> (form_ID).toJsCmd, (some) => {
>
> do your stuff here
>
> })
Looking at the source code I think this might work, but I'm having trouble
constructing the correct expression to pass to ajaxButton. The method signature
requires a
right, I wrote about that in my original post, but how can I execute a
button-specific method on the server-side?
Thanks,
Adam
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Marius wrote:
> The ajax buttons doesn't have to be inside the form if you use
> SHtml.submitAjaxForm(form_ID)
>
> blah
>
> Br's,
> Mari
There is also a related problem:
how can I have two ajax buttons on one form which submit the form and execute
different functions on the server?
Using the "standard" trick:
SHtml.ajaxForm(bind(...) ++ SHtml.hidden(submitFunction))
won't work, as I want different functions executed for different
Hello,
thanks, but my use-case is a bit different.
I want the whole form to be still submitted using a POST (the "normal" way),
and only use ajax for a small fragment of the page (the element editor). So I
can't use ajaxForm(...), as this would make all submit buttons use ajax.
Adam
On Jan 9,
13 matches
Mail list logo
