Re: [Lightning-dev] [META] Organization of 1.1 Spec Effort

2018-11-26 Thread René Pickhardt via Lightning-dev
Hey Rusty, No matter how we agree for the process I suggest to create a wiki page on which we make it transparent and link to it from README.md. The current process was new to me and I think one cannot expect newcomers to read through the entire Mailinglist. As soon as we have an agreement I can

Re: [Lightning-dev] [META] Organization of 1.1 Spec Effort

2018-11-26 Thread Matt Corallo
+100 for IRC meetings, though, really, I'd much much stronger prefer substantive discussion happen on GitHub or the mailing list. Doing finalization in a live meeting is really unfair to those who can't find the time to attend regularly (or happen to miss the one where that thing was discussed t

[Lightning-dev] [META] Organization of 1.1 Spec Effort

2018-11-26 Thread Rusty Russell
Hi all, As you may know, for 1.0 spec we had a biweekly Google Hangout, at 5:30am Adelaide time (Monday 19:00 UTC, or 20:00 UTC Q3/4). You can see the minutes of all meetings here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oU4wxzGsYd0T084rTXJbedb7Gvdtj4ax638nMkYUmco The current proce

Re: [Lightning-dev] lookupinvoice

2018-11-26 Thread Sarat G
Hi Rusty, Thanks for your reply. I'm using the C lightning repo for my project( https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning). Sorry, I framed the question wrongly. Yes, I can use listinvoices to look up for the invoices created at the node. My scenario is something like this, I'm looking up whe

Re: [Lightning-dev] Base AMP

2018-11-26 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning Johan, I believe what Rusty refers to here is a probe by an intermediate node, rather than a probe by the source node (who, as we know, already knows whether the payee supports AMP or not, by the invoice). Regards, ZmnSCPxj Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Ema