Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-28 Thread Tamas Blummer
Hi ZmnSCPxj, You are right that an exchange can not simply embed the option into the offer price as there is no payment in case the offer is not taken, so nothing would pay for their hedging costs. This however is not a unique situation, but people deal with it frequently. Every offer has a

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-28 Thread Tamas Blummer
Hi ZmnSCPxj, Making an asset swap offer using HTLC ties up funds and the offer may be taken up-until the timelock expiry. Therefore making such an offer implies both opportunity cost and a premium for optional exercise. There is no mechanism in LN to require compensation for above costs,

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-28 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning CJP, > > I think we've already addressed this issue before: > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-May/0012 > 92.html > > and especially this proposal of me: > https://bitonic.nl/public/slowdown_prevention.pdf > > It's not completely trustless, but I tend

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-28 Thread CJP
Hi ZmnSCPxj, I think we've already addressed this issue before: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-May/0012 92.html and especially this proposal of me: https://bitonic.nl/public/slowdown_prevention.pdf It's not completely trustless, but I tend to see trustlessness in