Re: [Lightning-dev] CPFP Carve-Out for Fee-Prediction Issues in Contracting Applications (eg Lightning)

2019-10-27 Thread Jeremy
Johan, The issues with mempool limits for OP_SECURETHEBAG are related, but have distinct solutions. There are two main categories of mempool issues at stake. One is relay cost, the other is mempool walking. In terms of relay cost, if an ancestor can be replaced, it will invalidate all it's child

Re: [Lightning-dev] CPFP Carve-Out for Fee-Prediction Issues in Contracting Applications (eg Lightning)

2019-10-27 Thread David A. Harding
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Johan TorĂ¥s Halseth wrote: > [...] what about letting the rule be > > The last transaction which is added to a package of dependent > transactions in the mempool must: > * Have no more than one unconfirmed parent. > [... subsequent email ...] > I realize

Re: [Lightning-dev] Rendez-vous on a Trampoline

2019-10-27 Thread Antoine Riard
Hi, Design reason of trampoline routing was to avoid lite nodes having to store the whole network graph and compute long-hop route. Trick lays in getting away from source-base routing, which has the nice property to hide hop position along the payment route (if we forget payment hash correleation)

Re: [Lightning-dev] Unpublished Channels, and a Proposal for Local Channel Publication

2019-10-27 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning list, Of note, is that long ago Rusty proposed already a "local" channel announcement: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-November/001486.html Briefly, the above proposal goes this way: > BigBrother: Hi LittleNode! > > LittleNode: Hi BigBrother! > > Big