Good morning again LL,
So I started thinking as well, about Decker-Russell-Osuntokun and the Fast
Forwards technique, as well as your "desync" idea.
And it seems to me that we can also adapt a variant of this idea with
Decker-Russell-Osuntokun, with the advantage of **not** requiring the
Good morning LL,
> Hi Z,
>
> I just went through the presentation which made your thinking very clear.
> Thanks.
> I will not be able to match this effort so please bear with me as I try and
> explain my own thinking.
> I don't see why fast forwards (FF) need "symmetrically encumbered outputs"?
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:18:42PM +, darosior via Lightning-dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been almost 9 months since Tor v2 hidden services have been deprecated.
> The Tor project will drop v2 support in about a month in the latest release.
> It will then be entirely be dropped from all
Hi Z,
I just went through the presentation which made your thinking very clear.
Thanks.
I will not be able to match this effort so please bear with me as I try and
explain my own thinking.
I don't see why fast forwards (FF) need "symmetrically encumbered outputs"?
To me the protocol should be
Hi all,
It's been almost 9 months since Tor v2 hidden services have been deprecated.
The Tor project will drop v2 support in about a month in the latest release. It
will then be entirely be dropped from all supported releases by October.
More at