On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 11:12:07AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 2. The balance transaction - tracks the funding transaction, contains
> a "balance" output for each of the participants.
> 3. The inflight transactions - spends a balance output from the balance
> transaction and provides ou
Hey aj,
This is awesome work. My line of research on "witness asymmetric channels"
essentially ended up in a dead end because I couldn't see how they were
much better than naive PTLC lightning. The idea I really liked from it was
"revocable signatures". I hoped someone would eventually figure out
Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What
would be the reasoning for not moving it?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 23:25, Fabrice Drouin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When you navigate to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/ you find
> - the Lightning Network white paper
> - the Lig
> H( private-key, msg, other-party's-nonce-pair, 1 )
That should work. I had thought that other-party's-nonce-pair would be unique
unknown randomness, but I can see now that it can be rederived from RA(n) or
RB(n).
> Hmm, you had me panicking that I'd been describing how to combine the
> two des
