I’m not sure I understand this - is there much reason to want taproot commitment outputs? I mean they’re cool, and witnesses are a bit smaller, which is nice I guess, but they’re not providing materially new features, AFAIU. Taproot funding, on the other hand, provides a Bitcoin-wide privacy improv
Good morning list,
The lightning network transaction format was updated to leverage CPFP
carve-out and allow nodes to set fees at broadcast time, using a feature
called anchor outputs [1].
While desirable, this change brought a whole new set of challenges, by
requiring nodes to maintain a reserve
Hi, Laolu.
I think it could be worth considering dividing the taprootyness of a
channel into two:
1) taproot funding output
2) taproot commitment outputs
That way we could upgrade existing channels only on the commitment level,
not needing to close or re-anchor the channels using an adapter in or
