[Lightning-dev] Release Announcement v23.05: Austin Texas Agreement(ATXA)

Hello Everyone, We're pleased to announce the 23.05 release of Core Lightning, named by @instagibbs. For a list of all changes, please see the changelog . Highlights for Users - NEW `commando-blacklist` and

[Lightning-dev] Jamming call May 15th

Hi List, A reminder that we've got another jamming call coming up next week. Monday 15 May 5 pm UTC https://meet.jit.si/UnjammingLN In this meeting, we’d like to discuss HTLC endorsement and local reputation [1]. We’ve updated the draft spec PR with some details on what we think reputation

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

Jorge, I invite you to consider reading your emails before you send them. During this reread, I specifically encourage you to do so with the frame of mind of how your words will be read and understood by others on this mailing list. The people on this list may have varying levels of familiarity

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

Hi Antoine, > I can say missing an open-source engineering meeting or being revoked a few > Github permissions matters far less than the clear affirmation and respect of > the freedom of expression, the presumption of innocence and due process in > the Bitcoin common space, all proportions

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

I challenge jeremy to a public debate somewhere. I forgot to say the name on that sentence. Just to clarify. If he believes he is on the right and I am on the wrong and "clearly delusional" (or whatever he accuses me of), then he shouldn't be scared of the debate, no? Oh, let me guess..."I don't

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

Pressumption of innocence? Right to defend yourself? Wow, that sounds amazing, but, for example, wouldn't me defendibg myself from jeremy rubin be offtopic like...pretty much everywhere? Not sure you're familiar with that story, certainly you didn't hear my side of the story, did you? Where would

Re: [Lightning-dev] HTLC Endorsement for Jamming Mitigation

Hi all, > > This gets compounded as soon as we start gossiping about reputations, > > since now our decisions are no longer based just on information we can > > witness ourselves, or at least verify its correctness, and as such an > > attacker can most likely "earn" a positive reputation in some

Re: [Lightning-dev] HTLC Endorsement for Jamming Mitigation

Hi all, > Some updates on channel jamming! > > # Next Call > - Monday 01 May @ 15:00 UTC > - https://meet.jit.si/UnjammingLN > - Agenda: https://github.com/ClaraShk/LNJamming/issues/12 > > # Data Gathering > During these weekly calls, we've come to agreement that we would like > to gather data