Re: [Lightning-dev] Remotely control your lightning node from your favorite HSM

2023-09-05 Thread Bastien TEINTURIER
Hey Zman, I saw the announcement about the commando plugin, and it was actually one of the reasons I wanted to write up what I had in mind, because while commando also uses a lightning connection to send commands to a lightning node, it was missing what in my opinion is the most important part:

Re: [Lightning-dev] Remotely control your lightning node from your favorite HSM

2023-09-05 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning t-bast, CLN already has something similar in standard CLN distrib: https://docs.corelightning.org/docs/commando However it is tied specifically to the CLN command set. Nevertheless, it is largely the same idea, just CLN-specific. Regards, ZmnSCPxj Sent with Proton Mail secure

[Lightning-dev] Remotely control your lightning node from your favorite HSM

2023-09-05 Thread Bastien TEINTURIER
Good morning list, I have just opened a PR to the bLIPs repository [1] to document an idea that I started investigating a long time ago and had already discussed with a few people, but never found the time to write it up before. This is a very simple architecture to securely send administrative

Re: [Lightning-dev] faster NIKE Sphinx or more secure KEM Sphinx

2023-09-05 Thread David Stainton
Hi Laolu, Finally someone who understands! I very much enjoyed reading your reply. > Re Kyber, what's the current state of production-ready implementations? > Language wise, the most popular LN implementations today are written in > either: C, Go, Rust, or Scala/Kotlin. I ask as most of the

Re: [Lightning-dev] faster NIKE Sphinx or more secure KEM Sphinx

2023-09-05 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Hi David, Happy to see that you're still working to push the state-of-the-art when it comes to mixnets! > Sphinx is essentially twice as fast if we eliminate the "blinding trick" > and only have one group operation per hop, the DH. In order to make that > work you'd also have to store the group