Re: [Lightning-dev] Bitcoin mail list needs an explicit moderation policy

2023-06-02 Thread Bryan Bishop
l list lacks clear explicit moderation (or > peer-review) policies, which must be applied on a non-selective basis. > Also, Bryan Bishop, as the current moderator, had abused his powers in > achieving his agenda based on personal likes or dislikes. The conversation > went nowhere, and the p

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

2023-05-08 Thread Bryan Bishop
Well, you could always send to bitcoin-...@lists.linuxfoundation.org -- we are usually pretty fast with email modqueue. On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:26 PM Tony Giorgio via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Is there a better place to have public communication? Unfortuna

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

2021-10-11 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:25 AM Andrés G. Aragoneses wrote: > Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What > would be the reasoning for not moving it? > One consideration is broken links, which can be solved by a soft note in a README somewhere. - Bryan https://twi

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning-dev down

2019-11-16 Thread Bryan Bishop
ZmnSCPxj, On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 9:41 PM ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Good morning list, > > A hundred to two hundred blocks ago, it seems the list was down, and > messages to the list were not deliverable. > This email also doubles as a test on