as we seemed
to be talking passed each other on that particular point.
Best regards
John-John Markstedt
___
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
r.
> That is what "proportional" means.
>
My initial point was that the fee would be proportionally higher for every
satoshi used closer to the far end of the channel.
So the fee would proportional to the state of the channel in addition to
the size of
)
>
I will have another closer look at the JIT Routing emails.
-
Thanks both of you for taking the time to respond and pointing out the
clear flaws in this idea.
Best regards,
John-John Markstedt
___
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.lin
be better
ways to solve this problem and there might be problems with this approach
I’m unaware of.
Anyway, some small tweaks in the protocol may lead to a much healthier
network which
may be worthy of exploration.
Best regards,
John-John Markstedt
___
Lightn
