[Lightning-dev] Goodbye Bitcoin

2022-03-06 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Hello kanzure mailing list and ln mailing list, This is my last email and I won't be involved in anything related to Bitcoin. If my username is used on GitHub or other places it can be considered someone else using it. -- Prayank A3B1 E430 2298 178F

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

2022-02-14 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
g and discuss >>> security considerations that aren't Lightning specific. >>> >>> > Note: Bitcoin Knots policy is fully configurable, even in the GUI - users >>> > can readily choose whatever policy *they* want. >>> >>> The maintainer(s)

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

2022-02-13 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
a crystal ball. Certainly > if you take the view that these policy rules should never be made effective > consensus rules then the fact there is at least one implementation taking a > contrasting approach to Core is a good thing. > > -- > Michael Folkson > Email: michaelfolkso

[Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

2022-02-12 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Hello World, There was a discussion about improving fee estimation in Bitcoin Core last year in which 'instagibbs' mentioned that we cannot consider mempool as an orderbook in which which everyone is bidding for block space because nodes can use different relay policies:

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] Pawn (chess piece) | Breaking bitcoin by playing chess

2021-12-04 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Can you share the email address to get approval or permission for this type of bitcoin transactions? i.e. opening and closing of LN channels or OP_RETURN. I will keep that in Cc next time. I can write chess moves on a dollar bill and send to my friends but it does not solve any of the

[Lightning-dev] Pawn (chess piece) | Breaking bitcoin by playing chess

2021-12-03 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Hello World, Link with what, why and how: https://gist.github.com/prayank23/22763f48199ed106e59801be43ad4efc Two related things that I found: 1.Koala Studio tried chess on LN in 2019 but shutdown in August 2019 2.Etleneum still has chess but works differently Primary goal of this project can

Re: [Lightning-dev] Issue assets on lightning

2021-10-15 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Good morning ZmnSCPxj, > I heard before that the RGB colored coin project had plans to be compatible > with Lightning so that channels could be denominated in an issued asset. RGB will address lot of things but I was wondering if such things should exist in LN implementations by default.

[Lightning-dev] Issue assets on lightning

2021-10-12 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Hello everyone, I wanted to know few things related to asset issuance on lightning: 1.Is it possible to issue assets on LN right now? If yes, what's the process and is it as easy as few commands in liquid: 

Re: [Lightning-dev] v0.10.1: "eltoo: Ethereum Layer Too"

2021-08-12 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
xt release if you > can think of one. > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 4:15 AM Prayank via Lightning-dev > wrote: > >> >> Hi Lisa, >> >> > lisa neigut Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:04:51 -0700 >> >> > We're pleased to announce the 0.10.1 release of c-lightning

Re: [Lightning-dev] v0.10.1: "eltoo: Ethereum Layer Too"

2021-08-11 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
Hi Lisa, > lisa neigut Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:04:51 -0700 > We're pleased to announce the 0.10.1 release of c-lightning > , named > by @nalinbhardwaj. I am confused about the subject of this email. Is this an Ethereum project? What

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] Removing the Dust Limit

2021-08-11 Thread Prayank via Lightning-dev
> As feerates have gone up over time, and as we expect them to go up further, >we should be considering drastically increasing the 3 sat/vByte basis to >something more like 20 sat/vB. I have no opinion on changing or removing dust limit. However, fee rates are not going up. Yes, we expect them