ood morning x raid,
>
> > We are talkin interoperability among impl not individual node operators
> version management of chosen impl.
> >
> > where Pierre of Acinq says
> > "So we eat our own dog food and will experience force closes before our
> users do..&q
"Finacial" need in preparation for onboarding 1B
by 2026 start to grow up *now*.
thanks
/xraid
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:14 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning x-raid,
>
> > so You propose Acinq / Blockstream / Lightning Labs do not have funds to
> run a box or 2 ?
>
&g
but dedicated test machines that do have nano granularity
in that request against runs can specify unix.ts(start)-range-unix.ts(end)
of box xyz and independently se if others and own impl behaves as it is
expected to.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 5:31 PM x raid wrote:
> so You propose Acinq / Blockstr
is supposed to convey - those with
the write credentials to repo, when do a public release could have been
tested, before, against the network, and that in no way hinders PR toward
said repo.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:44 PM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning x-raid,
>
> > what i can ima
have a solution for the central point collector that could
be run by an outside of impl teams perimeter. (sponsored?)
/xraid
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:35 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning again x-raid,
>
> Are you proposing as well to provide the hardware and Internet c
I propose a dialog of the below joint effort ...
thanks
/xraid
***
A decentralised integration lab where CL Eclair LDK LND (++ ?) runs each
the latest release on "one box" rBOX and master.rc on "another box" rcBOX.
The rBOX of each impl has a channels to the other impl rBOXés
same setup goes
Gentlemen,
The micropayment system that is LN today has some limitations in
pathfinding with hops accommodating the needed liquidity with regards
to larger amounts, where probability of success and the forward fee
also needs to be accounted for in a total cost of attempt.
Probability and cost
