Re: [Lightning-dev] Closing Transaction Cut-through as a Generalization of Splice-in/Splice-out

Good morning Christian, > > The connection the channel factories is not really necessary, as long as > > we have an invalidation scheme that allows us to invalidate a prior > > funding transaction we can reseat without needing a cut-through, just > > invalidate the funding tx of the old

Re: [Lightning-dev] Closing Transaction Cut-through as a Generalization of Splice-in/Splice-out

ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev writes: > Suppose, rather than implement a splice-in/splice-out ("channel > top-up", etc.) we instead implement a more general "cut-through" for a > channel close transaction. > > Normally a channel close spends a single input

[Lightning-dev] Closing Transaction Cut-through as a Generalization of Splice-in/Splice-out

Good morning list, I have the below speculation idea. Suppose, rather than implement a splice-in/splice-out ("channel top-up", etc.) we instead implement a more general "cut-through" for a channel close transaction. Normally a channel close spends a single input and makes 1 or 2 outputs.