On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Rusty Russell
wrote:
> > It's good, though not as good as if both sender and recipient could set
> > their own fees. I know it would have made everything more complicated
> but
> > receiving is actually more costly than sending. If you have less balance
> > than
Edward Marynarz writes:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Rusty Russell
> wrote:
>
>>
>> In particular, fees are charged on entry to the channel, so if there's
>> an A->B channel, A charges the fee. If you traverse B->C, B charges the
>> fee, etc.
>>
>
> Thank you for your explanations.
>
> It
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Rusty Russell
wrote:
>
> In particular, fees are charged on entry to the channel, so if there's
> an A->B channel, A charges the fee. If you traverse B->C, B charges the
> fee, etc.
>
Thank you for your explanations.
It's good, though not as good as if both se
Johan Torås Halseth writes:
> Hi, Edward! Welcome to the mailing list :)
> The fees can indeed be set for each direction of the channel, check out
> https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/master/07-routing-gossip.md#the-channel_update-message
>
> [https://github.com/lightningnet
Hi, Edward! Welcome to the mailing list :)
The fees can indeed be set for each direction of the channel, check out
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/master/07-routing-gossip.md#the-channel_update-message
[https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/master/07-routi
I tried to find this information in the BOLT documents but I couldn't find
it. Is it possible to set up the channel so that the fee depends on the
direction, i.e. a different fee on the receive direction and different on
the send one? Why such functionality?
Imagine that you start with a bidirecti
