Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-09 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning Tyler, > This is not the intention. This BOLT _does not_ replace bootstrapping seed > functionality, now or ever. A client can supplement her view of the network > by getting the graph from well-known nodes if she wishes, but no more. To do > otherwise _would_ centralize the

Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-09 Thread Tyler H
> Connect is not the same as make a channel with. Connect simply lets you access gossip information. So the hard-coded node is not privileged: it simply relays gossip information to the wallet, equivalent to getting an entire map of the network as visible from that node. The plan is that you

Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-09 Thread Tyler H
Christian, I hope the additional clarification in the RFC makes clear that BOLT 10 takes precedence for bootstrapping and autopilot functionality. To summarize the intention of this BOLT: Lightning is authoritative, but DNS can be used to assist in on-boarding (with all of its usefulness AND

Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-09 Thread Christian Decker
Tyler, thanks for the detailed feedback, I'll try to address some of the issues inline: Tyler H writes: > --Regarding looking up nodes at the time of payments: > > In the future, nodes could negotiate a channel open with a push amount and > provide the TXID or payment hash as

Re: [Lightning-dev] QR of node information

2018-04-09 Thread Igor Cota
Hi all, On 9 April 2018 at 11:47, Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Is this really only about reducing the size of QR codes? How many > percent reduction do you think you can accomplish with your approach? I > think, when it comes to reducing QR

Re: [Lightning-dev] QR of node information

2018-04-09 Thread Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev
Why put everything in bech32? It hurts readability. The only possible advantage is that data inside the bech32 blob can be digitally signed in a convenient way. If you don't need that, I'd keep your data ourside the bech32 blob, in a (expert-)human-readable format. Why not follow a regular URL