Things are even worse if \start/stopStaff is happen at line-break, repeat-signs
and different StaffSymbol.line-positions are used.
~~~
\paper {
indent = 0
line-width = 40
}
musII = {
\repeat volta 2 { c'1 }
%\workAround
\break
\stopStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol.line-positions = #'(-6)
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
\startStaff
\repeat volta 2 { c'1 }
}
\new StaffGroup
<<
\new Staff \musII
\new Staff \musII
~~~
See attached png.
A workaround for the Barline could be:
~~~
workAround =
\once \override Staff.BarLine #'before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(if (eqv? LEFT (ly:item-break-dir grob))
(begin
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'bar-extent '(-5 . -1))
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'Y-extent '(-5 . -1))
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'Y-offset 3))))
~~~
Still no SpanBar, that's issue 2876, though.
Attachments:
-
[atest-63-1.png](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/_discuss/thread/42f48c44/d912/attachment/atest-63-1.png)
(8.8 kB; image/png)
---
** [issues:#3609] \stopStaff at the end of a measure should produce a bar line
spanning the previous staff lines**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Sun Oct 13, 2013 03:09 PM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Sun Oct 13, 2013 03:09 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
*Originally created by:* *anonymous
*Originally created by:*
[elu...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/114137843947982417046/)
several uglies have been discussed in this thread
[http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ugly-bar-line-when-changing-line-count-td152072.html](http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ugly-bar-line-when-changing-line-count-td152072.html)
1\. the main outline is that a \stopStaff \startStaff doesn't terminate
"correctly" a measure with a staff-bar covering the full line-count of the
preceding measure but just spans the line-count of the following code.
2\. when a time signature change \(or key or clef\) occurs the staff lines of
the preceding and following measure overlap.
3\. if there are accidentals involved they are not clearly separated from the
preceding part
workarounds are presented in the link above but the majority of the
participants to the discussion \(66:33%\) vote for a clean LilyPond integrated
solution - and honestly I'd also appreciate if this would happen automatically.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
