On 14-Sep-04, at 1:52 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
When writing scientific papers with math formulas in them, I often
use a comma before the formula. If you think of the figure as an
inserted clarification in the sentence, it makes sense to use
a comma. (Of course, then you would like a comma also aft
There's two things I need help with, somewhat urgently before 3.0:
1) In the manual, "Controlling formatting of prefatory matter"
(currently 5.3.10): there's an example of doing weird stuff with the
clef and key signature, and no explanatory text. If it's just an
example of doing weird stuff,
On 15-Sep-04, at 3:14 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@internalsref{foo} creates "see _foo_".
No, this is unintentional; @internalsref is a macro. We may have to
adjust the macro definition.
After editing another section of the manual, I think that we do indeed
need to adjust
CVS ChangeLog 1.2624 on 'make all' exits like this:
bison -o out/parser.cc parser.yy
mv -f parser.yy.tab.c out/parser.cc # bison < 1.30
mv: can't stat source parser.yy.tab.c
make[1]: [out/parser.cc] Error 1 (ignored)
rm -f ./out/parser.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/parser.dep
./out/parser.o" g+
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > ...
> > > Well, ...
> > >
> > > (1) There is no \unset command for grob properties (at least not that I
> > > know of). Hence, I guess by "unset dash-fraction" you mean
> > > "\override TextSpanner #'d
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> ...
> > Well, ...
> >
> > (1) There is no \unset command for grob properties (at least not that I
> > know of). Hence, I guess by "unset dash-fraction" you mean
> > "\override TextSpanner #'dash-fraction = #'()"? At least, this trick
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > > else
> > > > > {
> > > > > return make_line (thick, from, t
Hi!
In section 5.3.8 of the manual ("Bar lines"), the last \mark in the second
figure (lily-1457749936.ly) does not show up: there should be a ":"
printed above the rightmost dotted bar line.
Greetings,
Jürgen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > else
> > > > {
> > > > return make_line (thick, from, to);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you
Section 7.1.5 ("Changing context default settings") contains twice the
line:
\override Stem #'thickness
I guess, this should be
\override Stem #'thickness = #2.0
or something alike, right?
Greetings,
Jürgen
___
lilypond-devel ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > else
> > > {
> > > return make_line (thick, from, to);
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you sure that the "else" branch (i.e. making a solid line) should be
> > > re
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > else
> > {
> > return make_line (thick, from, to);
> > }
> >
> >
> > Are you sure that the "else" branch (i.e. making a solid line) should be
> > regardless of the "style" property entered only if "sc
12 matches
Mail list logo
