On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 02:36, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/carl/lilypond/current-cvs/lilypond'
> > > make: *** [web] Error 2
> > >
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong?
>
> this looks like a GS bug. What version are you
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 05:49, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I invite you all to follow this example, and post where you would like
> to steer LilyPond to. To keep the discussion focused, please respond
> with what you plan to contribute rather than what you want to have.
I hope to be able to develop a
> >> Between 2.3.18 or so (maybe as late as .20 or .22) and .25,
> >> lilypond-book no longer indents the first line in long (two-page)
> >> scores in latex documents.
> >
> > Example, please, for further investigation.
>
> It applies to two-line examples, too.
If you don't specify the `indent'
> IIRC, we agreed on 3 character indentation for .ly files, right? Looking
> at examples.itely and notation.itely, this is currently quite
> inconsistent. In particular, Werner, you have recently changed the
> indentation of my mensural music transcription example in section 3.6.1
> from 3 c
> I can view the .eps file with gsview, but if I run gs from the
> command line, I get the same error as when I run make web.
I suggest you get the CVS version of gs and test again.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
> > + . To get consistent indentation in the DVI output it is better
> > +to avoid the @verbatim environment. Use the @example
> > +environment instead if possible, but without extraneous
> > +indentation. [...]
>
> can you elaborate? What's inconsistent about verbatim vs. example?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There is no latex log file running lilypond nonverbose.
>
> After applying the patch:
>
> Layout output to `simple.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number
> Syntax error: Bad fd number
> Converting to `simple.dvi'...
> Converting to `simple.ps'...
> Converting to `simple.pd
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> What an ITP is? Anyway, I'll happily maintain the ecfonts package
> (using your cygwin packaging target),
Yes, that's what I meant to ask. Debian and Cygwin use intent to
package.
> as soon I get 2.4.x working on my computer. So, if I'm able to use
> 2.4.x as I could 2.
Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What an ITP is? Anyway, I'll happily maintain the ecfonts package
it's a debianism: Intend to Package
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
Now, sorry for the confusion, but we also need a Cygwin maintainer,
and a Cygwin ITP. I'd be very glad if Bertalan would do this.
What an ITP is? Anyway, I'll happily maintain the ecfonts package (using
your cygwin packaging target), as soon I get 2.4.x working on my
computer. So, if I'm abl
Pedro Kroger writes:
> My plan is to ask for a sponsor to upload the package. I've been
> "fixing" the ec-fonts-mftraced package so lintian and linda won't
> complain :-)
Great.
> My question is: would you (Jan) like to be the maintainer of the
> package, or can I assume this role?
Please ass
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You'll have to ask approval on cygwin-apps, or wait for
>> ec-fonts-mftraced to be included in Debian.
>
> So, what's the strategy? Are you planning to send an ITP?
My plan is to ask for a sponsor to upload the package. I've been
"fixing" the ec-fo
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You'll have to ask approval on cygwin-apps, or wait for
>> ec-fonts-mftraced to be included in Debian.
>
> So, what's the strategy? Are you planning to send an ITP?
My plan is to ask for a sponsor to upload the package. I've been
"fixing" the ec-fo
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> My question is: what to do with the ec-mftraced package to allow
>> lilypond-2.4.0-1 to be uploaded?
>
> You'll have to ask approval on cygwin-apps, or wait for
> ec-fonts-mftraced to be included in Debian.
So, what's the strategy? Are you planning to send an ITP?
J
By inspecting the running requirements in page
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/INSTALL.html#TOC7
I got an idea that Python-scripts could be byte-compiled. That would reduce the
number of running requirements even more. Does it make sense?
--
Terveisin
Heikki Junes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> + . To get consistent indentation in the DVI output it is better to avoid
> +the @verbatim environment. Use the @example environment instead if
> +possible, but without extraneous indentation. For example, this
> +
> + @example
> +foo {
> +
Hi there,
with 2.4 just released, it is time to share what each of us is up to.
In this post, I want to tell you about my plans for LilyPond for the
coming time.
I invite you all to follow this example, and post where you would like
to steer LilyPond to. To keep the discussion focused, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/carl/lilypond/current-cvs/lilypond'
> > make: *** [web] Error 2
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong?
this looks like a GS bug. What version are you running?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:/
18 matches
Mail list logo
