Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > @menu > > - * Slurs:: > > + * Slurs:: > > @end menu > > > > ? > > Is it just the whitespace at the end of the second line?? > > Yes, texinfo-all-menus-update adds extraneous whitspace. That > should be fixed, but there is little point in removing it all the > time. I've reported this to the

Re: LilyPond 2.5.13 won't compile on MacOS X

2005-02-28 Thread Matthias Neeracher
On Feb 28, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Matthias Neeracher writes: MacOS X is one of the platforms without libio, and it seems that the changes in 2.5.13 to accommodate those are not enough yet. Do I have to manually define ALIAS_FILE_TO_FILECOOKIE on my platform? No, it was (hop

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Edward Sanford Sutton
The following should hint you as to how to modify the Makefile in the ports directory. I haven't had time to try to push such changes into ports. The port maintainer has not responded to anything in a long time that I am aware of. The lilypond-devel port (2.3.2?) is currently broken due to t

Editors, was: Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: On 28-Feb-05, at 11:40 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Graham Percival writes: Is it just the whitespace at the end of the second line?? Yes, texinfo-all-menus-update adds extraneous whitspace. That should be fixed, but there is little point in removing it all the time. ... e

Make web on 2.5.13

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Johnson
It's been a couple of versions in the 2.5 tree since I've been able to make web. (Last working "make web" was for version 2.5.11.) I'm including the dump from 2.5.13 -- anybody have any ideas (other than removing lily-1812551792 before making web)? --Daniel Processing `lily-1812551792.ly' Par

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Pedro Kröger
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pedro Kröger writes: > >> I do this from time to time (nag maintainers) and some of them are >> responsive some are not :-( >> I guess it's time to start the nagging season again :-) > > Ok, thanks. no need to thank me, it's in my job description (b

Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > OK, this makes a lot more sense. I was worried that texinfo had > suddenly > became whitespace-sensitive. :) > > I'm happy to report that I've figured out how to exit emacs (saving or > not) > and how to type x texinfo-all-menus-update > > I can't stand being in ed

Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Graham Percival
On 28-Feb-05, at 11:40 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Graham Percival writes: Is it just the whitespace at the end of the second line?? Yes, texinfo-all-menus-update adds extraneous whitspace. That should be fixed, but there is little point in removing it all the time. ... especially since it'll get

Re: mensural notation: patch, question, plan

2005-02-28 Thread Benk� P
Hi, I was wondering, could you provide some description for the NEWS file of what you have changed in the ancient notation in your previous patch? White mensural ligatures now conform more closely to renaissance usage (on the input side maximae are allowed; the output has changed completely). Ba

Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival writes: > @menu > - * Slurs:: > + * Slurs:: > @end menu > > ? > Is it just the whitespace at the end of the second line?? Yes, texinfo-all-menus-update adds extraneous whitspace. That should be fixed, but there is little point in removing it all the time. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhu

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kröger writes: > I do this from time to time (nag maintainers) and some of them are > responsive some are not :-( > I guess it's time to start the nagging season again :-) Ok, thanks. Btw, how's your Debian developership coming along? ;-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Graham Percival
On 28-Feb-05, at 2:42 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Assuming you run emacs, can you do ... which I don't. But I'm installing emacs now just for this. Once I've finished editing everything with a real text editor (vi), I'll run emacs and try to figure out how to use it. texinfo-all-menus-update

Re: LilyPond 2.5.13 won't compile on MacOS X

2005-02-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Matthias Neeracher writes: > MacOS X is one of the platforms without libio, and it seems that the > changes in 2.5.13 to accommodate those are not enough yet. Do I have > to manually define ALIAS_FILE_TO_FILECOOKIE on my platform? No, it was (hopefully) broken by a bit carelessly placed ifdef tha

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:54:54AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > FreeBSD maintainer of Lilypond is irresponsive :-( > > That's too bad. FYI: Matt Jibson currently works on an OpenBSD port (of LilyPond and related tools), that I hope to test and watch over soon. May be that this can be back

LilyPond 2.5.13 won't compile on MacOS X

2005-02-28 Thread Matthias Neeracher
MacOS X is one of the platforms without libio, and it seems that the changes in 2.5.13 to accommodate those are not enough yet. Do I have to manually define ALIAS_FILE_TO_FILECOOKIE on my platform? Matthias rm -f ./out/libc-extension.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/libc-extension.dep ./out/libc-e

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Pedro Kröger
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We need more agressive distribution maintainers, or maybe a > distribution mainainer spanking MEISTER :-) I do this from time to time (nag maintainers) and some of them are responsive some are not :-( I guess it's time to start the nagging season ag

mensural notation: patch, question, plan

2005-02-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 2005-02-27 Pal Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lily/mensural-ligature.cc (brew_flexa): > make flexa parts of ligatures look more similar to square parts > > * lily/include/mensural-ligature.hh: explanatory comments > > Hi Jürgen (and all), > > I'v

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ZbynÄk Burget writes: > O.K. - I was try contact some FBSD developers and I've promised > help. If I compile lilypond successfully, I try upgrade lilypond FBSD > port to 2.4.4 Great. Btw, the patch I sent was b0rked, here's the corrected one. Jan. Index: lily-guile.cc

Re: Compilation on FreeBSD

2005-02-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ZbynÄk Burget writes: > FreeBSD maintainer of Lilypond is irresponsive :-( That's too bad. > in FreeBSD is only lilypond-2.2.2 Debian (and thus? ubuntu) is stuck at 2.2.6. We need more agressive distribution maintainers, or maybe a distribution mainainer spanking MEISTER :-) > and lilypond-de

State of docs

2005-02-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Everything from notation.itely has been split up now. Everything is > roughly > in the right file. > > I'll be rearranging basic-notation, instrument-notation, and > advanced-notation > over the next few days. After I'm finished with those, I'll be > tweaking some