[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> On 4-Mar-05, at 11:33 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > don't use the TeX backend. Starting with 2.6 (release will be
> > soonish), this backend is not officially endorsed anymore.
>
> Does that change anything for lilypond-book?
No, not really. lilypond-book now sim
On 4-Mar-05, at 11:33 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
don't use the TeX backend. Starting with 2.6 (release will be
soonish), this backend is not officially endorsed anymore.
Does that change anything for lilypond-book?
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>exit (2);
> }
>
> + /* Now we chroot, setuid/setgrp and chdir. If something goes wrong, we
> exit (this is a
> + security-sensitive area). */
> +
> + /* We must retrieve the user/group id *before* chroot'ing! */
> + int uid, gid;
Style nitpicks:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Whoops, I forgot one important aspect.
>
> Presently, the whole thing works for compiling *with the --tex option*.
> I have not yet explored the possibility of having a larger set of the
> compilation process carried out, but this seems to me a minor problem,
> as I thi
Whoops, I forgot one important aspect.
Presently, the whole thing works for compiling *with the --tex option*.
I have not yet explored the possibility of having a larger set of the
compilation process carried out, but this seems to me a minor problem,
as I think it is always possible to run the ot
Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is a satisfactory solution for people wanting to run lily
> on a server, with greater freedom than that provided by safe mode.
I agree - privilege limitations are already well covered and enforced
by the kernel. Better to reuse that well-
Dear developers,
I think I found a reasonable solution.
I'm including a patch for main.cc against the current stable release
(2.4.4). It adds new options
--set-user ('u')
--set-group ('g')
--chroot ('r')
--chdir ('d')
that allow one to first chroot, then setuid/setgrp, and finally chdir.
Using
May I ask whether this patch might be the desired way to add quarter-tone
pitchnames to deutsch.ly? I know it is not complete, but is already
helpful for me. I can completeit later, or do it another way if somebody
hints me how to do it.
Thanks, Arno
--
http://www.arnowaschk.de
deutsch.patc
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:40 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> There is a RPM spec in the tarball
> (make/out/lilypond.fedora.spec). Due to GS issues, building the doc
> rpm doesn't work, but building the base program does
>
Apparently the packager forgot to include a build dependency on
fontforge
