[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there a particular .scm file in CVS which I can add to my 2.5.15
> install without having to do a complete rebuild?
No.
You should apply the following patch.
Index: separating-group-spanner.cc
===
RCS
Is there a particular .scm file in CVS which I can add to my 2.5.15
install without having to do a complete rebuild?
Getting your feeble attempt reminds me that a programmers hunch is
usually wrong. After rewriting a 1.5 page clumsy function down to a
1.0 page function, I found that your file sti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I have a pretty good hunch what causes it. Take the line
> >
> > Can you send me your file (private mail is fine), so I can try to
> > rewrite the offending routine? Thanks
> Sending my feeble attempts at coding to the master reminds me of school
> days. And, when
The main problem is security: you can make lilypond run scheme code that
purges your (the server's) hardrive.
Is running lilypond in colinux faster than with cygwin?
Berti
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Again selfquoting...
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:18:16PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:18:16 +0100
> From: Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: More makefile oddities (was: Suspicious path issues...
Matthias Kilian writes:
> Has anyone an idea what's going on here?
That's because of what happens in include, quite kinky stuff.
Try:
depth=../..
IMAGES=$(wildcard *.png)
OUT_EPS_IMAGES=$(addprefix $(outdir)/,$(IMAGES:.png=.eps))
include $(depth)/make/stepmake.make
.PHONY: foo bar
foo:
In the absence of a FreeBSD port maintainer that will actually maintain the
port here is a guide to building the lilypond port on FreeBSD 5.3. The
lilypond version shipped with FreeBSD is version 2.2.2 which is a good,
stable version that I have been using for a while. It doesn't have the latest
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> b) references a target `outimages' which isn't defined anywhere, thus
> breaking make web.
I just saw that you've removed this for 2.5, so did I on my local
working copy of 2.4.
However, I now have the problem that gmake does
Now that I read it again, it does make sense, so you can forget
my comment.
/Mats
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, I'm not sure that the text on the page is fully correct (for the
technically included users). Especially the paragraph on top of the
first score looks wrong t
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Szabó Árpád Zoltán" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: easier LilyPond tutorial?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > This is my first post around here, so please forgive me if it was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Also, I'm not sure that the text on the page is fully correct (for the
> technically included users). Especially the paragraph on top of the
> first score looks wrong to me. However, I'm not sure I understand all
> the details well enough. Could you or Han-Wen take a car
Also, I'm not sure that the text on the page is fully correct (for the
technically included users). Especially the paragraph on top of the
first score looks wrong to me. However, I'm not sure I understand all
the details well enough. Could you or Han-Wen take a careful look at
the text to make sure
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> I know how to space it wider, is to add manual line breaks. Are there other
>> methods?
>
> Yes. Read Our Fine Manual.
IWBN, if
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Horizontal-spacing.html#Horizontal-spacing
which explains what h
fyi, typo in lily address.
--- Begin Message ---
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> I had dinner with Anthony last night. I'll follow up with more
> information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is that, is that public? We are a bit concerned with old
LilyPond packages, and a potential new maintainer (Pedr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This is my first post around here, so please forgive me if it was discussed
> here (pointers in the list-archive are welcome), but don't you think it
> would be a good idea to build a web-based lilypond service? The whole thing
> could work very much like noteserver.org:
On Friday 11 March 2005 13.02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Why don't you just space the piece a little wider?
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand.. It seems that I'm missing something. The only
> > way I know how to space it wider, is to add manual line breaks. Are there
On Friday 11 March 2005 02.50, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> That's not the problem. The real problem is that we can't determine
> the number of pages necessary (the amount of vertical space required)
> until after line breaking has been decided. This is because the
> vertical space required may change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Why don't you just space the piece a little wider?
>
> Sorry, I don't understand.. It seems that I'm missing something. The only way
> I know how to space it wider, is to add manual line breaks. Are there other
> methods?
Yes. Read Our Fine Manual.
--
Han-
Good news for a change:
With the release commit at ChangeLog 1.3282 and the new ghostscript RPM
I was able to compile Lily and build the web docs.
-David
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
19 matches
Mail list logo
