On Thursday 14 April 2005 21.31, Stephen wrote:
> Given all the options for automatic accidentals: voice, modern,
> modern-voice, piano, no-reset, forget, and default, one of them must answer
> every situation if you take the time to learn them. I find it confusing
> when there are multiple ways to
Given all the options for automatic accidentals: voice, modern,
modern-voice, piano, no-reset, forget, and default, one of them must answer
every situation if you take the time to learn them. I find it confusing when
there are multiple ways to do the same thing. I'd look carefully at the
curren
Again, I think some of the bugs would be solved by setting the first note in
the span to the previous dynamic level or barring that to a default dynamic
level and conceptually considering the dynamic change to fall between the
notes rather than on the notes. Perhaps extending the last dynamic ch
I am not a lilypond hacker (just an user, bug admin and hacker wannabe).
However, I could suggest you to start with a
grep Span_dynamic_performer ly/* scm/* lily/*>
span-dynamic-performer.cc is the file I want to look at. the structure
Audio_dynamic_tuple threw me off. I confused that with a regul
Note also that these bugs have low priority among developers, since there
are
plans to rewrite the midi system from scratch.>
My comments can be taken two ways, as suggestions for a rewrite of
span-dynamic-performer.cc or as a wish-list for the new implementation. If I
where to contribute to the
> > It `normalizes' the `@' character, so it no longer is of type
> > `letter'. I also wonder why it's here. Additionally, it should
> > be
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > to make TeX stop parsing after the `2'.
> >
>
> Isn't his what \makeatother is for?
This isn't defined for plain TeX.
I have somewhat rashly volunteered to be Implementation documenter.
Han-Wen informs me that various abortive starts have already been made
on this. So if you have any material that would be useful, please e-mail
it to me.
thanks
/Bernard
___
lilypond
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:09 -0300, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
> First of all, if you want this reply to the mailinglist instead of
> personally, then why did you mail me personally in the first place? (not
I apologise. I just switched email clients (from emacs+VM to
Evolution), and I am still copin
> > First what is the code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for?
>
> It `normalizes' the `@' character, so it no longer is of type
> `letter'. I also wonder why it's here. Additionally, it should be
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> to make TeX stop parsing after the `2'.
>
Isn't his what \makeatother is for? I
