> > Why is there the .99 factor in the original code? I don't think
> > that this makes any visible difference.
>
> i guess, historical reasons. It must have went from 0.9 to 0.95 to
> 0.99, I guess.
OK. I'll set it to 1 soon, after revising your latest glyph additions
to the feta code.
W
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: warning: no feasible beam position
Stephen wrote:
Hi,
Is this a bug? The last note of the first system is fl
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Why is there the .99 factor in the original code? I don't think that
this makes any visible difference.
i guess, historical reasons. It must have went from 0.9 to 0.95 to 0.99
, I guess.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 6-Nov-05, at 8:37 PM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
>
>> I spent a good hour last night trying to figure out how to add extra
>> verses to the end of a piece I'm writing. It wasn't in the obvious place
>> in the docs, and I was only able to find something similar to what
On 6-Nov-05, at 8:37 PM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I spent a good hour last night trying to figure out how to add extra
verses to the end of a piece I'm writing. It wasn't in the obvious
place
in the docs, and I was only able to find something similar to what I
wanted in the Regression Tests.
Why is there the .99 factor in the original code? I don't think that
this makes any visible difference.
Werner
==
--- feta-banier.mf.old 2005-11-11 14:51:51.0 +0100
+++ feta-banier.mf 2005-11-12 09:29:46.6
